SSDB VS kvrocks

I've used SSDB[0] in the past for some really stupid large datasets (20TB)_and it worked really well in production

[0] https://github.com/ideawu/ssdb

> Or wanting to shift the architecture entirely to avoid using memory-bound Redis as a queue with an overflow risk.

I wanted to use SSDB[1] instead of Redis for that reason, but it doesn't support the necessary data structures.

[1] https://github.com/ideawu/ssdb

There is also ssdb https://github.com/ideawu/ssdb

It's 2021 and we have extremely fast key-value lookups using LevelDB/RocksDB, but we're still using RAM-based caching tools [1] [2] [3]. It's time to consider RAM-based caching harmful, and start caching with SSDs for larger datasets and lower costs. For ex: SSDB [4]

[1] https://redis.io/

[2] https://memcached.org/

[3] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29532552

[4] https://github.com/ideawu/ssdb#ssdb-vs-redis

Aside from this particular use-case, which is what most people here are talking about -- I had never heard of the SSDB project, but it interests me because I often use Redis for certain things it's able to do, aside from its in-memory storage, and sometimes the fact that the data is not stored on disk is a bit of a drawback for me, something I have to work around.

I switched from SSDB to Kvrocks recently, because SSDB is abandoned and the author missing for 3 years now. I used to recommend SSDB, but now there's better alternatives available:

https://github.com/apache/kvrocks

https://github.com/sabledb-io/sabledb

Another under the radar Apache project I've found myself using is Apache KvRocks

https://github.com/apache/kvrocks

It's a Redis compatible database on top of RocksDB, so unlike Redis it uses the disk instead of RAM, but you can control how much data is cached in RAM, obviously Kvrocks will be slower than Redis for uncached data.

Useful in situations where you want a KV data store that isn't limited by your memory specs but is compatible with everything that speaks Redis.

There’s Kvrocks. It uses the Redis protocol and it’s built on RocksDB https://github.com/apache/kvrocks

Apache Kvrocks is a distributed key-value NoSQL database that uses RocksDB as a storage engine and is compatible with Redis protocol.

We use Kvrocks[0] at work. It is Redis on disk, powered by "RocksDB" (hence the name) and compatible with most of the Redis clients since it respects the Redis protocol. It was incubated by Apache earlier this year.

It works great and the development is really active.

[0]: https://kvrocks.apache.org