sourcery VS Rope

In my experience, the developer tools that really catch on do so via word of mouth. For example, our whole team recently adopted https://sourcery.ai/ (not an ad) because one developer tried it and hyped it up to everyone else who also liked it.

To those that wish to automate a subset of these conventions, there is a tool called Sourcery[1] that I, personally, am a huge fan of! Not only does it have a large set of default rules[2], but it can also allow you to write your own rules that may be specific to your team or organization, and as mentioned it can enable you to follow Google's Python style guide as well[3].

There are some refactorings that Sourcery suggest that I don't agree with myself, namely the usage of 'contextlib.suppress'[4] as I don't like to introduce an additional 'import' statement just to do something so trivial. I wish Sourcery would add the relevance of having possibly too many 'import' statements as a heuristic.

---

[1]: https://sourcery.ai/

[2]: https://docs.sourcery.ai/Reference/Default-Rules/ (expand the sub-pages)

[3]: https://docs.sourcery.ai/Reference/Optional-Rules/gpsg/

During development, tools like Sourcery could show you improvements for code quality.

One of the first tools I install when setting up my Python dev environment is Sourcery. This still uses AI/ML to suggest code improvements to your Python code, but unlike GitHub's Copilot, it won't write code for you.

"Sourcery" exists

Looks downright wicked https://sourcery.ai/

As a bit of trivia, https://sourcery.ai/ will replace

I guess you have to signup in their website sourcery.ai. I actually don't use sourcery, I don't know the details on how to get the token.

When I'm writing Python, one of my favorite tools is [Sourcery](https://sourcery.ai/). Are there any similar tools for Go? What else do you recommend?

Hi, maintainer of rope here. There are a number of different options to use rope in Vim/Neovim, we've documented them in this page https://github.com/python-rope/rope/wiki/Rope-in-Vim-or-Neovim

If you're looking for something with a bigger codebase, then the rope library in which pylsp-rope is based on is also welcoming of contributions.

I think rope is the standard for refactoring, and should provide autoimports soon, though pyright might also be good for that.

rope

If you are interested in discussing this or have ideas you want to sketch out, meet me at rope's GitHub Discussion.

However, my biggest and most popular open source project is one that I don't originally write, but rather I inherited a popular project that has been abandoned by their original author/maintainers. I use Python a lot, so I wanted to contribute to the community in a significant way, so unlike my other projects I do take the time promoting this project as well. I felt it's more like a community service for this project.

I am the maintainer rope and pylsp-rope. They are libraries for automated Python refactoring and to do that from any LSP-capable editors. We are always welcoming contributors of all levels.

Rope has first class support for Vim and it can do a move refactoring, among other refactorings. From this, this feature is available from python-mode and ropevim.

rope

Okay this depends: if your code is static: perfectly possible for example with https://github.com/python-rope/rope (used for example by VS Code). If it's dynamic / generated via metaprogramming: I never tried it but I can't imagine that it'd work there, yes. However java tooling also can't do that because it simply doesn't support metaprogramming in any noteworthy way.