sorbet-rails VS rbs

There are solutions like sorbet[^1] and sorbet-rails[^2]. Have you tried them?

[^1]: https://sorbet.org/

[^2]: https://github.com/chanzuckerberg/sorbet-rails

Ruby does have optional type annotations, if you want them:

https://github.com/ruby/rbs

Is anyone using RBS? Or, is it still half-baked? I haven't seen any recent posts about it this year. Though, I see the repo has some recent activity.

Currently rbs collection resolves stdlib dependencies, but rbs -r LIB option doesn't resolve them unfortunately. For instance, logger depends on monitor, but rbs -r logger doesn't load monitor.

Here is link number 1 - Previous text "RBS"

RBS is a nice new feature but what's really cool, and I hope it will be include in the standard library, is Async

Partial clone reduces the impact, but it just procrastinates the problems.

rbs collection has other known issues. See https://github.com/ruby/rbs/pull/589 and https://github.com/ruby/rbs/issues/794 for more information.

Specify simple types (with class names or literal values), or complex types (with RBS notation) for each property of your struct:

Ruby is slowly starting to drift towards better type functionality, with first Sorbet and then RBS. But you don't need any static typing tool in your own code to do things smarter.