Revolutionize your code reviews with AI. CodeRabbit offers PR summaries, code walkthroughs, 1-click suggestions, and AST-based analysis. Boost productivity and code quality across all major languages with each PR. Learn more →
Rbs Alternatives
Similar projects and alternatives to rbs
-
-
CodeRabbit
CodeRabbit: AI Code Reviews for Developers. Revolutionize your code reviews with AI. CodeRabbit offers PR summaries, code walkthroughs, 1-click suggestions, and AST-based analysis. Boost productivity and code quality across all major languages with each PR.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
SaaSHub
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
minitest
minitest provides a complete suite of testing facilities supporting TDD, BDD, mocking, and benchmarking.
-
-
-
-
-
-
SaaSHub
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
rbs discussion
rbs reviews and mentions
-
Implementing a simple object system from scratch in Ruby
You are correct technically, but the implication that you must sacrifice speed or static typing is practically incorrect: faster on startup than .NET [0]. You can get benefits similar to static typing in for a while now [1].
[0] tested locally on a Linux environment
[1] https://github.com/ruby/rbs#readme
-
Rewrite It in Rails
https://github.com/ruby/rbs
is the "officially supported" one. It's terrible, as is Sorbet. No offense to anyone involved with either of the projects, they just miss the mark in pretty fundamental ways.
-
A decent VS Code and Ruby on Rails setup
I saw no mention of RBS+Steep, the latter providing a LSP. I use it a lot and very much like it, although it's still young and needs love, but it's making good, steady progress! I've been very pleasantly surprised by some of the crazy things Steep can catch, completely statically!
You appear to be working on projects with Sorbet (which I tried to like but found it fell short in practice, notably outside of the app use case i.e it's mostly useless for gems) so it may be a tall order to try on those. Maybe you can give RBS+Steep a shot on some small project?
RBS: https://github.com/ruby/rbs
RBS collection (for those gems that don't ship RBS signatures in `sig`, integrates with bundler): https://github.com/ruby/gem_rbs_collection
Steep: https://github.com/soutaro/steep
VS Code: https://github.com/soutaro/steep-vscode
Sublime Text: https://github.com/sublimelsp/LSP
Vim (I'm working on it): https://github.com/dense-analysis/ale/pull/4671
- What it was like working for Gitlab
-
InfoQ Interview: Rich Kilmer on the Power of Ruby
Are you familiar with rbs (https://github.com/ruby/rbs)? If so, what issues do you see with using that over TypeScript?
- Building GitHub with Ruby on Rails
-
Ruby 3.2’s YJIT is Production-Ready
Ruby does have optional type annotations, if you want them:
https://github.com/ruby/rbs
- Crystal for Rubyists
-
Is anyone using RBS?
Is anyone using RBS? Or, is it still half-baked? I haven't seen any recent posts about it this year. Though, I see the repo has some recent activity.
-
RBS introduced manifest.yaml
Currently rbs collection resolves stdlib dependencies, but rbs -r LIB option doesn't resolve them unfortunately. For instance, logger depends on monitor, but rbs -r logger doesn't load monitor.
-
A note from our sponsor - CodeRabbit
coderabbit.ai | 21 Mar 2025
Stats
ruby/rbs is an open source project licensed under GNU General Public License v3.0 or later which is an OSI approved license.
The primary programming language of rbs is Ruby.