sokol-odin
papers-we-love
sokol-odin | papers-we-love | |
---|---|---|
4 | 69 | |
61 | 83,807 | |
- | 1.3% | |
8.9 | 3.2 | |
6 days ago | 16 days ago | |
C | Shell | |
- | - |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
sokol-odin
-
Odin Programming Language
* etc
There is also the second issue that C is technically TWO languages: the C programming language and the C preprocessor. People mix the two together and things cannot be easily translated. A good basic example of this is people using `#define` for constants, and thus that name has no semantic meaning in the language itself. A translator has to try and make some semantic meaning from the intersection of these two languages, even if people don't make a distinction when making APIs.
And Odin's `foreign` system allows [1] for a lot of really nice things that most other languages cannot do so tersely. Here are two examples of demonstrating bindings of C libraries that feel as if they were native Odin libraries WITHOUT any wrappers:
* https://github.com/floooh/sokol-odin/blob/main/sokol/gfx/gfx... (and the rest)
-
Nim v2.0 Released
I maintain auto-generated bindings for my C libraries for Zig and Nim (and Odin and Rust - although the Rust bindings definitely need some love to make them a lot more idiomatic).
I think looking at the examples (which is essentially the same code in different languages) gives you a high level idea, but they only scratch the surface when it comes to language features (things like the Zig code not using comptime features):
Zig: https://github.com/floooh/sokol-zig/tree/master/src/examples
Nim: https://github.com/floooh/sokol-nim/tree/master/examples
Odin: https://github.com/floooh/sokol-odin/tree/main/examples
Rust: https://github.com/floooh/sokol-rust/tree/main/examples
-
I think Zig is hard but worth it
I'm actually dabbling with Odin a bit in the scope of language bindings for the sokol headers:
https://github.com/floooh/sokol-odin
It's a very enjoyable language!
-
I like the Odin programming language
I recently wrote a bindings generator to Odin for my C libraries, and the FFI is very well thought out, down to defining things like linker dependencies in the code. For instance see here:
https://github.com/floooh/sokol-odin/blob/main/sokol/gfx/gfx...
The only minor downside (compared to Zig) is that Odin still requires a separate C/C++ toolchain to actually build the C dependencies. But I guess that's a typical 1st-world-problem ;)
(but AFAIK Odins FFI system isn't in any way related or depending on LLVM).
papers-we-love
-
The Top 10 GitHub Repositories Making Waves 🌊📊
Papers We Love (PWL) is a community built around reading, discussing and learning more about academic computer science papers. This repository serves as a directory of some of the best papers the community can find, bringing together documents scattered across the web. You can also visit the Papers We Love site for more info.
- What led you to use Linux as your daily driver?
-
We have used too many levels of abstractions and now the future looks bleak
You might find the paper Out of the Tar Pit interesting if you haven't already read it: https://github.com/papers-we-love/papers-we-love/blob/main/d...
The ideas and approaches you talk about evoked some of the concepts from that paper for me. It talks a lot about separating accidental complexity and infrastructure so you can focus only on what is essential to define your solutions.
- Out Of The Tar Pit (2006) [pdf]
-
John McCarthy’s collection of numerical facts for use in elisp programs
Sure he was expecting a practical language and was designing one. Lisp was from day zero a project to implement a real programming language for a computer.
Earlier he experimented with IPL and also list processing programming on Fortran. The plan was to implement a Lisp compiler. At first the Lisp code McCarthy was experimenting with, was manually translated to machine code.
Then came up the idea to use EVAL as a base for an interpreter, which was implemented by manually translating the Lisp code to machine language. Around 1962 then a compiler followed.
https://github.com/papers-we-love/papers-we-love/blob/main/c...
-
Python: Just Write SQL
I'm in a 4th camp: we should be writing our applications against a relational data model and _not_ marshaling query results into and out of Objects at all.
Elaborations on this approach:
- https://github.com/papers-we-love/papers-we-love/blob/main/d...
- https://riffle.systems/essays/prelude/
- CS Journals and Magazines?
-
Ask HN: Incremental View Maintenance for SQLite?
The short ask: Anyone know of any projects that bring incremental view maintenance to SQLite?
The why:
Applications are usually read heavy. It is a sad state of affairs that, for these kinds of apps, we don't put more work on the write path to allow reads to benefit.
Would the whole No-SQL movement ever even have been a thing if relational databases had great support for materialized views that updated incrementally? I'd like to think not.
And more context:
I'm working to push the state of "functional relational programming" [1], [2] further forward. Materialized views with incremental updates are key to this. Bringing them to SQLite so they can be leveraged one the frontend would solve this whole quagmire of "state management libraries." I've been solving the data-sync problem in SQLite (https://vlcn.io/) and this piece is one of the next logical steps.
If nobody knows of an existing solution, would love to collaborate with someone on creating it.
[1] - https://github.com/papers-we-love/papers-we-love/blob/main/design/out-of-the-tar-pit.pdf
-
Good papers for high school students?
Here is a great Repo on GitHub named paers-we-love. You will surely find some great papers there and also some good other resources. Hope this helps.
-
I think Zig is hard but worth it
However, f and g are interchangeable anywhere else (this is not actually true because their addresses can be obtained and compared; showing that a C-like language retains its referential transparency despite the existence of so-called l-values was the point of what I think is the first paper to introduce the notion referential transparency to the study of programming languages: https://github.com/papers-we-love/papers-we-love/blob/main/l...)
What are some alternatives?
linux - Linux kernel source tree
Crafting Interpreters - Repository for the book "Crafting Interpreters"
wayland - Core Wayland protocol and libraries (mirror)
Flowgorithm-macOS - Flowgorithm for Mac OS
mvb-opencv - Minimum Viable Bindings to OpenCV for Nim
elm-architecture-tutorial - How to create modular Elm code that scales nicely with your app
v - Simple, fast, safe, compiled language for developing maintainable software. Compiles itself in <1s with zero library dependencies. Supports automatic C => V translation. https://vlang.io
clojure-style-guide - A community coding style guide for the Clojure programming language
RFCs - A repository for your Nim proposals.
git-internals-pdf - PDF on Git Internals
FrameworkBenchmarks - Source for the TechEmpower Framework Benchmarks project
salsa - A generic framework for on-demand, incrementalized computation. Inspired by adapton, glimmer, and rustc's query system.