Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality. Learn more →
Papers-we-love Alternatives
Similar projects and alternatives to papers-we-love
-
zig
General-purpose programming language and toolchain for maintaining robust, optimal, and reusable software.
-
WorkOS
The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS. The APIs are flexible and easy-to-use, supporting authentication, user identity, and complex enterprise features like SSO and SCIM provisioning.
-
Reactive-Resume
A one-of-a-kind resume builder that keeps your privacy in mind. Completely secure, customizable, portable, open-source and free forever. Try it out today!
-
InfluxDB
Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale. Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
-
Previous Serverless Version 0.5.x
⚡ Serverless Framework – Use AWS Lambda and other managed cloud services to build apps that auto-scale, cost nothing when idle, and boast radically low maintenance.
-
what-happens-when
An attempt to answer the age old interview question "What happens when you type google.com into your browser and press enter?"
-
react-admin
A frontend Framework for building data-driven applications running on top of REST/GraphQL APIs, using TypeScript, React and Material Design
-
SaaSHub
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
papers-we-love reviews and mentions
-
The Top 10 GitHub Repositories Making Waves 🌊📊
Papers We Love (PWL) is a community built around reading, discussing and learning more about academic computer science papers. This repository serves as a directory of some of the best papers the community can find, bringing together documents scattered across the web. You can also visit the Papers We Love site for more info.
- What led you to use Linux as your daily driver?
-
We have used too many levels of abstractions and now the future looks bleak
You might find the paper Out of the Tar Pit interesting if you haven't already read it: https://github.com/papers-we-love/papers-we-love/blob/main/d...
The ideas and approaches you talk about evoked some of the concepts from that paper for me. It talks a lot about separating accidental complexity and infrastructure so you can focus only on what is essential to define your solutions.
- Out Of The Tar Pit (2006) [pdf]
-
John McCarthy’s collection of numerical facts for use in elisp programs
Sure he was expecting a practical language and was designing one. Lisp was from day zero a project to implement a real programming language for a computer.
Earlier he experimented with IPL and also list processing programming on Fortran. The plan was to implement a Lisp compiler. At first the Lisp code McCarthy was experimenting with, was manually translated to machine code.
Then came up the idea to use EVAL as a base for an interpreter, which was implemented by manually translating the Lisp code to machine language. Around 1962 then a compiler followed.
https://github.com/papers-we-love/papers-we-love/blob/main/c...
-
Python: Just Write SQL
I'm in a 4th camp: we should be writing our applications against a relational data model and _not_ marshaling query results into and out of Objects at all.
Elaborations on this approach:
- https://github.com/papers-we-love/papers-we-love/blob/main/d...
- https://riffle.systems/essays/prelude/
- CS Journals and Magazines?
-
Ask HN: Incremental View Maintenance for SQLite?
The short ask: Anyone know of any projects that bring incremental view maintenance to SQLite?
The why:
Applications are usually read heavy. It is a sad state of affairs that, for these kinds of apps, we don't put more work on the write path to allow reads to benefit.
Would the whole No-SQL movement ever even have been a thing if relational databases had great support for materialized views that updated incrementally? I'd like to think not.
And more context:
I'm working to push the state of "functional relational programming" [1], [2] further forward. Materialized views with incremental updates are key to this. Bringing them to SQLite so they can be leveraged one the frontend would solve this whole quagmire of "state management libraries." I've been solving the data-sync problem in SQLite (https://vlcn.io/) and this piece is one of the next logical steps.
If nobody knows of an existing solution, would love to collaborate with someone on creating it.
[1] - https://github.com/papers-we-love/papers-we-love/blob/main/design/out-of-the-tar-pit.pdf
-
Good papers for high school students?
Here is a great Repo on GitHub named paers-we-love. You will surely find some great papers there and also some good other resources. Hope this helps.
-
I think Zig is hard but worth it
However, f and g are interchangeable anywhere else (this is not actually true because their addresses can be obtained and compared; showing that a C-like language retains its referential transparency despite the existence of so-called l-values was the point of what I think is the first paper to introduce the notion referential transparency to the study of programming languages: https://github.com/papers-we-love/papers-we-love/blob/main/l...)
-
A note from our sponsor - InfluxDB
www.influxdata.com | 27 Apr 2024
Stats
The primary programming language of papers-we-love is Shell.
Popular Comparisons
- papers-we-love VS Crafting Interpreters
- papers-we-love VS Flowgorithm-macOS
- papers-we-love VS elm-architecture-tutorial
- papers-we-love VS clojure-style-guide
- papers-we-love VS git-internals-pdf
- papers-we-love VS react-bits
- papers-we-love VS salsa
- papers-we-love VS moodycamel
- papers-we-love VS android_guides
- papers-we-love VS cookiecutter-django
Sponsored