slice_deque
FrameworkBenchmarks
slice_deque | FrameworkBenchmarks | |
---|---|---|
2 | 366 | |
152 | 7,398 | |
- | 0.6% | |
0.0 | 9.8 | |
over 2 years ago | 5 days ago | |
Rust | Java | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
slice_deque
-
A lock-free ring-buffer with contiguous reservations (2019)
> It's not an attack on the wording, but the correctness of your first bullet point. `unsafe` is appropriate for the initialization of a ring buffer in Rust. That's true for using `mmap` or anything in "pure" Rust using the allocator API to get the most idiomatic representation (which can't be done in safe or stable Rust). It's not one line. It's also not platform dependent, the code is the same on MacOS, Linux, and Windows the last I tried it.
We're not talking about the same thing then.
I'm talking about this code here: <https://github.com/gnzlbg/slice_deque/tree/master/src/mirror...> It is absolutely platform specific.
Yes, most ring buffer implementations feature a little bit of `unsafe` code. No, it doesn't make sense to say "I have a tiny amount of `unsafe` already, so adding more has no cost."
> But if your bottleneck is determined by the frequency at which channels get created or how many exist then I would call architecture into the question. ... This last month I've written a lock-free ring buffer to solve a problem and there's exactly one in an application that spawns millions of concurrent tasks.
Okay, but a lot of applications or libraries are written to support many connections, and you don't necessarily know when writing the code (or even when your server receives them) if those connections will be just cycled very quickly or will be high-throughput long-lived affairs. Each of those probably has a send buffer and a receive buffer. So while it might make sense for your application to have a single ring buffer for its life, applications which churn through them heavily are completely valid.
-
Go is about to get a whole lot faster
There is a single contiguous memory allocation, which mirrors itself.
One thread produces elements and pushes them at the tail (e.g. I/O bytes, in batch), and one thread consumes as many elements as possible in batch from the other end (e.g. all bytes available, in batch).
The mirror is required to allow processing all elements in the deque as if they were adjacent in memory.
This is the library i am using, the array contains an explanation : https://github.com/gnzlbg/slice_deque
FrameworkBenchmarks
-
Why choose async/await over threads?
Neat. Thanks for sharing!
Interestingly, may-minihttp is faring very well in the TechEmpower benchmark [1], for whatever those benchmarks are worth. The code is also surprisingly straightforward [2].
[1] https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/
[2] https://github.com/TechEmpower/FrameworkBenchmarks/blob/mast...
-
Ntex: Powerful, pragmatic, fast framework for composable networking services
ntex was formed after a schism in actix-web and Rust safety/unsafety, with ntex allowing more unsafe code for better performance.
ntex is at the top of the TechEmpower benchmarks, although those benchmarks are not apples-to-apples since each uses its own tricks: https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#hw=ph&test=fortune&s...
-
A decent VS Code and Ruby on Rails setup
Ruby is slow. Very slow. How much you may ask? https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#hw=ph&test=fortune&s... fastest Ruby entry is at 272th place. Sure, top entries tend to have questionable benchmark-golfing implementations, but it gives you a good primer on the overhead imposed by Ruby.
It is also not early 00s anymore, when you pick an interpreted language, you are not getting "better productivity and tooling". In fact, most interpreted languages lag behind other major languages significantly in the form of JS/TS, Python and Ruby suffering from different woes when it comes to package management and publishing. I would say only TS/JS manages to stand apart with being tolerable, and Python sometimes too by a virtue of its popularity and the amount of information out there whenever you need to troubleshoot.
If you liked Go but felt it being a too verbose to your liking, give .NET a try. I am advocating for it here on HN mostly for fun but it is, in fact, highly underappreciated, considered unsexy and boring while it's anything but after a complete change of trajectory in the last 3-5 years. It is actually the* stack people secretly want but simply don't know about because it is bundled together with Java in the public perception.
*productive CLI tooling, high performance, works well in a really wide range of workloads from low to high level, by far the best ORM across all languages and back-end framework that is easier to work with than Node.JS while consuming 0.1x resources
-
The Erlang Ecosystem [video]
Although that seems to have improved in recent years.
https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#hw=ph&test=json§...
-
Ruby 3.3
RoR and whatever C++ based web backend there is count as a valid comparison in my book. But comparing the languages itself is maybe a bit off.
On a side note, you can actually compare their performance here if you’re really curious. But take it with a grain of salt since these are synthetic benchmarks.
https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks
-
API: Go, .NET, Rust
Most benchmarks you'll find essentially have someone's thumb on the scale (intentionally or unintentionally). Most people won't know the different languages well enough to create comparable implementations and if you let different people create the implementations, cheating happens. The TechEmpower benchmarks aren't bad, but many implementations put their thumb on the scale (https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks). For example, a lot of the Go implementations avoid the GC by pre-allocating/reusing structs or allocate arrays knowing how big they need to be in advance (despite that being against the rules). At some point, it becomes "how many features have you turned off." Some Go http routers (like fasthttp and those built off it like Atreugo and Fiber) aren't actually correct and a lot of people in the Go community discourage their use, but they certainly top the benchmarks. Gin and Echo are usually the ones that are well-respected in the Go community.
-
Rage: Fast web framework compatible with Rails
There is certainly a lot of speculation in Techempower benchmarks and top entries can utilize questionable techniques like simply writing a byte array literal to output stream instead of constructing a response, or (in the past) DB query coalescing to work around inherent limitations of the DB in case of Fortunes or DB quries.
And yet, the fastest Ruby entry is at 274th place while Rails is at 427th.
https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#hw=ph&test=fortune&s...
-
Node.js – v20.8.1
oh what machine? with how many workers? doing what?
search for "node" on this page: https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r21
-
Strong typing, a hill I'm willing to die on
JustJS would like a word https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r20&tes...
-
Rust vs Go: A Hands-On Comparison
In terms of RPS, this web service is more-or-less the fortunes benchmark in the techempower benchmarks, once the data hits the cache: https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r21
Or, at least, they would be after applying optimizations to them.
In short, both of these would serve more rps than you will likely ever need on even the lowest end virtual machines. The underlying API provider will probably cut you off from querying them before you run out of RPS.
What are some alternatives?
zio-http - A next-generation Scala framework for building scalable, correct, and efficient HTTP clients and servers
drogon - Drogon: A C++14/17 based HTTP web application framework running on Linux/macOS/Unix/Windows [Moved to: https://github.com/drogonframework/drogon]
django-ninja - 💨 Fast, Async-ready, Openapi, type hints based framework for building APIs
LiteNetLib - Lite reliable UDP library for Mono and .NET
C++ REST SDK - The C++ REST SDK is a Microsoft project for cloud-based client-server communication in native code using a modern asynchronous C++ API design. This project aims to help C++ developers connect to and interact with services.
SQLBoiler - Generate a Go ORM tailored to your database schema.
Laravel - The Laravel Framework.
CoreWCF - Main repository for the Core WCF project
Spiral Framework - High-Performance PHP Framework
web-frameworks - Which is the fastest web framework?
bjoern - A screamingly fast Python 2/3 WSGI server written in C.
fastapi - FastAPI framework, high performance, easy to learn, fast to code, ready for production