skiko VS rust-analyzer

All I know is that they use skiko.

It built on a render framework named skia, JetBrains create a kotlin mapping which named skiko for it.

I was curious to give it a go but unusable on Gnome 42.5; the window lags so much that simply trying to drag to reposition it on the screen is impossible seems related an issue with Skiko and OpenGL reported here: https://github.com/JetBrains/skiko/issues/494

Fleet does not use Compose, but it does use Skiko[1], which also provides binding for Skia[2] (the native graphics library also used by Chrome & Flutter).

The main difference between the libraries is that Skija provides Java/JVM bindings for Skia, whereas Skiko provides Kotlin bindings for Kotlin/JVM, Kotlin/JS, and Kotlin/Native targets. Of course Skiko's Kotlin/JVM bindings can be used with other JVM languages, not just with Kotlin.

[1] https://github.com/JetBrains/skiko

[2] https://skia.org/

How about skiko?

JetBrains is moving from skija to skiko, but it could be interesting either way!

They Merged today the functions that will be usaged on Compose for opening, closing and handling text inputs https://github.com/JetBrains/skiko/pull/455 (if I understand correctly). Currently, the examples rely on xcodegen file, based on the currently plugin that Compose has for Desktop, it provide alot of things including packaging for desktop, I think they will provide a xcodegen file automatically and use xcodegen behind the scenes to generate everything needed.

https://github.com/JetBrains/skiko (a Kotlin MPP binding for Skia). Skiko Does not contain build for iOS. Now Skiko contains build for iOS, MAC arm processor via Kotlin/Native. So we can use Skiko for pure canvas rendering in all platform. It is matter of time they release compose for iOS. So UI also goes multiplatform.

But it does seem like the solution they're using for Fleet is different. Skia is the same graphics library used by Chromium and Flutter. I'll remain cautiously optimistic for now, but the quality of the text rendering and customization options will make or break it for me personally.

go build 3.62s user 0.76s system 171% cpu 2.545 total

I was looking forward to parallel front-end[4], but I have not seen any improvement for these small changes.

[1]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer

For example, intelephense can show diagnostics in real time, there is no need to save the file to get new diagnostics. But rust-analyzer, the language server for rust, can only update diagnostics after saving the file.

6. Rust Analyzer

The rust-analyzer readme suggests you go here for support request. But even there, you'll need to provide more details to get useful help.

For example: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/blob/master/docs/...

> If you create an LSP, it will work best in VS Code.

Any editor can work just as well as (or even better than) VS Code.

So, apparently the reason why rust-analyzer, the LSP server for Rust does not have persistent caching is because it would make "optimizing initial passes less important".

All I want to know is: Will it have a build configuration pulldown?

I am not a Rust dev. It surely looks great.

However, from what I understand it seems to supply just a parser separate from the Rust compiler (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/tree/master/crate...) trying to keep up with Rust‘s development. So, in principle, it could have been just another treesitter parser plugin, too.

So, again, the LSP framework does not directly provide any magical benefit over a static parsing framework. All the semantic analysis capabilities stem from a good parser.

rust-analyzer > manual > helix > binary > rustup component add rust-analyzer