signalr-socket-dotnet5 VS H.Pipes

Compare signalr-socket-dotnet5 vs H.Pipes and see what are their differences.

signalr-socket-dotnet5

Real-time application using SignalR and .NET 5 (by hgmauri)
Signalr signalr-core Real-time Socket .NET Net5 signalr-server signalr-hub
Source Code
Suggest alternative
Edit details

H.Pipes

A simple, easy to use, strongly-typed, async wrapper around .NET named pipes. (by HavenDV)
.NET C# Pipes Ipc net-core Net5 net6 Serialization access-control namedpipeserverstream Netstandard20
Source Code
Suggest alternative
Edit details
WorkOS
Our great sponsors
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
Our great sponsors
signalr-socket-dotnet5 H.Pipes
2 1
5 211
- -
0.0 7.6
over 2 years ago 19 days ago
C# C#
- MIT License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

signalr-socket-dotnet5

Posts with mentions or reviews of signalr-socket-dotnet5. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects.

H.Pipes

Posts with mentions or reviews of H.Pipes. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects.
  • Named Pipes in .NET 6 with Tray Icon and Service
    1 project | news.ycombinator.com | 23 Nov 2021
    I think this is the first NamedPipes tutorial in C# that I've ever seen that doesn't do things completely wrong by using a StreamWriter or StreamReader. Of course, that's because it uses another library that wraps all the tricky bits of NamedPipes that everybody always does wrong -> https://github.com/HavenDV/H.Pipes

    NamedPipes are sweet for doing same-machine IPC on Windows, that is for sure, but the built-in API is full of footguns.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing signalr-socket-dotnet5 and H.Pipes you can also consider the following projects:

Bitwarden - The core infrastructure backend (API, database, Docker, etc).

FFmpeg.NET - .NET wrapper for common ffmpeg tasks

core-admin - Fully automatic admin site CRUD UI generator for ASP.NET Core and .NET 8

realtime-csharp - A C# client library for supabase/realtime.

Dahomey.Json - The main purpose of this library is to bring missing features to the official .Net namespace System.Text.Json

Mixcore CMS - šŸš€ Mixcore CMS is an Future-Proof Enterprise Web CMS that supports both headless and decoupled to easily build any kinds of app/web app/all in all/customizable APIs built on top of ASP.NET Core / Dotnet Core. It is a completely open-source ASP.NET Core (Dotnet Core) CMS solution. https://mixcore.org

DevToAPI - Forem/DEV API Client Library for .NET

qatoolkit-auth-net - QAToolKit library for generating JWT access tokens from different identity providers.

KZMaker - KartaZbiĆ³rkiMaker is software wich allows you to make Karta ZbiĆ³rki documents faster and simplier, than on paper.

Cursively - A CSV reader for .NET. Fast, RFC 4180 compliant, and fault tolerant. UTF-8 only.

HttpRecorder - .NET HttpClient integration tests made easy.

signalr-socket-dotnet5 vs Bitwarden H.Pipes vs FFmpeg.NET signalr-socket-dotnet5 vs core-admin H.Pipes vs core-admin signalr-socket-dotnet5 vs realtime-csharp H.Pipes vs Dahomey.Json signalr-socket-dotnet5 vs Mixcore CMS H.Pipes vs DevToAPI H.Pipes vs qatoolkit-auth-net H.Pipes vs KZMaker H.Pipes vs Cursively H.Pipes vs HttpRecorder