self-hosted
fsl.software
self-hosted | fsl.software | |
---|---|---|
29 | 8 | |
7,284 | 82 | |
1.5% | - | |
9.1 | 8.5 | |
7 days ago | 25 days ago | |
Shell | HTML | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | - |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
self-hosted
-
Pydantic Logfire
I was responding to the One of the Sentry inconvenience is self-hosting: it relies on so many services it can be very complicated to maintain part, and also reminding readers that if they, too, hate companies that rug-pull their open source licenses, there is a band-aid for both parts
Compare https://github.com/getsentry/self-hosted/blob/9.1.2/docker-c... with https://github.com/getsentry/self-hosted/blob/24.4.2/docker-... for what life used to be like for running Sentry on-prem. It was awesome
It would take a ton of work to dig up the actual memory and CPU requirements of each one, but rest assured they're not zero, so every one of those services eats ram and requires TLC when, not if, they shit themselves. So, more parts == more headaches with all other things being equal
Then, I deeply appreciate that there are a whole spectrum of reactions to the various licensing schemes in use nowadays, and a bunch of folks don't care. I care, though, because I have gotten immense value from open source projects, and have contributed changes back to quite a few. It has been my life experience that any of those "source available" licenses usually are very hostile toward making local builds and if I can't build it to match how prod goes, then I can't test my fixes in my environment and then I can't contribute the PR with any faith
-
Sentry new TOS to use data to train AI with no opt-out
This is the point where I will point out that you can self-host Sentry free of charge :) https://develop.sentry.dev/self-hosted/
-
Low cost self-hosted bug reporting?
Sentry can be self hosted: https://develop.sentry.dev/self-hosted/
-
FSL: A License for the Bazaar, Not the Cathedral
The people we're concerned about are not the hundreds of thousands of Sentry users, including those that self-host.
We're concerned about people who have taken the software for the purposes of competing directly against us, that hinders our ability to monetize the work. Monetizing the work helps us continue improving the software and distribute it for free use, benefitting those aforementioned real users (e.g. https://github.com/getsentry/self-hosted).
-
Show HN: A open-source financial accounting alternative to QuickBooks
> I mean no slander or disrespect to anyone involved, but there was a DataDog alternative posted sometime in the last few weeks that had a docker-compose with like 15 containers in it.
Reminds me of Sentry: https://develop.sentry.dev/self-hosted/
This is their example docker-compose for self-hosting: https://github.com/getsentry/self-hosted/blob/master/docker-...
It has:
- exim4 (smtp)
-
OpenTelemetry in 2023
> What should people use?
I recall Apache Skywalking being pretty good, especially for smaller/medium scale projects: https://skywalking.apache.org/
The architecture is simple, the performance is adequate, it doesn't make you spend days configuring it and it even supports various different data stores: https://skywalking.apache.org/docs/main/v9.0.0/en/setup/back...
The problems with it are that it isn't super popular (although has agents for most popular stacks), the docs could be slightly better and I recall them also working on a new UI so there is a little bit of churn: https://skywalking.apache.org/downloads/
Still better versus some of the other options when you need something that just works instead of spending a lot of time configuring something (even when that something might be superior in regards to the features): https://github.com/getsentry/self-hosted/blob/master/docker-...
Sentry is just the first thing that comes to mind (OpenTelemetry also isn't simpler due to how much it tries to do), but compare its complexity to Skywalking: https://github.com/apache/skywalking/blob/master/docker/dock...
I wish there was more self-hosted software like that out there, enough to address certain concerns in a simple way on day 1 and leave branching out to more complex options like OpenTelemetry once you have a separate team for that and the cash is rolling in.
- Why use application stacks script installers
-
OpenObserve: Elasticsearch/Datadog alternative in Rust.. 140x lower storage cost
Sounds interesting!
Will you compare with qryn? Self-hosted sentry?
qryn.metrico.in/
https://develop.sentry.dev/self-hosted/
-
Insufficient logging
I haven't done it in years, but technically sentry is able to be self hosted https://github.com/getsentry/self-hosted
- Cloud Native Alternative to Sentry?
fsl.software
-
SSPL Is Bad
Functional Source License (FSL) is a good alternative, it automatically converts the released source code to to Apache 2.0 or MIT after two years. It's simple, provides a reasonable way for SaaS companies to function with source available and works automatically, so if the company goes under the users/community are not left with nothing.
https://fsl.software/
- Provide examples of where FSL should and should not be considered
-
Arch Linux bugtracker migration to Gitlab completed
would you trust Gitlab Enterprise Edition more if it had FSL license? https://fsl.software/
- FSL: Functional Source License
-
The BUSL Factor
Just heard about the new FSL.
A simple question: I found out the drafting process is publicly accessible on GitHub [0], but it seems that most of the collaborators are not layers. Is the license lawyer reviewed?
[0]: https://github.com/getsentry/fsl.software/issues/4
-
FSL: A License for the Bazaar, Not the Cathedral
> The phrase you quoted "harmful freeloaders" does not appear in any of our texts.
This is nit-picking pedantry. The term "free-riders" appears six times on this site https://fsl.software/. Whilst you might not have opened vim and typed out the words on this site, you've very publicly chosen this license and linked to this text.
You either endorse it, or you don't. If you don't, I'm interested in why you've chosen a license where you fundamentally have different values to the license's authors?
-
Sentry Relicense Again (FSL)
> The main issue of such a license is that you can't fork the project when they go in a direction that you don't like.
As long as it's not a Competing Use, yes, you can [0]. I don't get why so many people think you can't fork a project that uses BUSL, SSPL, ELv2, and now FSL. Just like any other OSS licenses, you can fork. And you just like any other OSS fork, you can't relicense.
It's obvious people don't actually read the license.
[0]: https://github.com/getsentry/fsl.software/blob/main/FSL-1.0-...
What are some alternatives?
Sentry - Developer-first error tracking and performance monitoring
loose-confederation - Functional Source License (FSL) [Moved to: https://github.com/getsentry/fsl.software]
Code-Server - VS Code in the browser
team-ospo - Open Source Program Office (OSPO)
apprise - Apprise - Push Notifications that work with just about every platform!
zammad-docker-compose - Zammad Docker images for docker-compose
ML-Workspace - 🛠All-in-one web-based IDE specialized for machine learning and data science.
JupyterLab - JupyterLab computational environment.
RegExr - RegExr is a HTML/JS based tool for creating, testing, and learning about Regular Expressions.
RequestBin
Tailwind CSS - A utility-first CSS framework for rapid UI development.