Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality. Learn more →
Fsl.software Alternatives
Similar projects and alternatives to fsl.software based on common topics and language
-
InfluxDB
Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale. Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
-
self-hosted
Sentry, feature-complete and packaged up for low-volume deployments and proofs-of-concept
-
loose-confederation
Discontinued Functional Source License (FSL) [Moved to: https://github.com/getsentry/fsl.software]
fsl.software reviews and mentions
-
SSPL Is Bad
Functional Source License (FSL) is a good alternative, it automatically converts the released source code to to Apache 2.0 or MIT after two years. It's simple, provides a reasonable way for SaaS companies to function with source available and works automatically, so if the company goes under the users/community are not left with nothing.
https://fsl.software/
- Provide examples of where FSL should and should not be considered
-
Arch Linux bugtracker migration to Gitlab completed
would you trust Gitlab Enterprise Edition more if it had FSL license? https://fsl.software/
- FSL: Functional Source License
-
The BUSL Factor
Just heard about the new FSL.
A simple question: I found out the drafting process is publicly accessible on GitHub [0], but it seems that most of the collaborators are not layers. Is the license lawyer reviewed?
[0]: https://github.com/getsentry/fsl.software/issues/4
-
FSL: A License for the Bazaar, Not the Cathedral
> The phrase you quoted "harmful freeloaders" does not appear in any of our texts.
This is nit-picking pedantry. The term "free-riders" appears six times on this site https://fsl.software/. Whilst you might not have opened vim and typed out the words on this site, you've very publicly chosen this license and linked to this text.
You either endorse it, or you don't. If you don't, I'm interested in why you've chosen a license where you fundamentally have different values to the license's authors?
-
Sentry Relicense Again (FSL)
> The main issue of such a license is that you can't fork the project when they go in a direction that you don't like.
As long as it's not a Competing Use, yes, you can [0]. I don't get why so many people think you can't fork a project that uses BUSL, SSPL, ELv2, and now FSL. Just like any other OSS licenses, you can fork. And you just like any other OSS fork, you can't relicense.
It's obvious people don't actually read the license.
[0]: https://github.com/getsentry/fsl.software/blob/main/FSL-1.0-...
-
A note from our sponsor - InfluxDB
www.influxdata.com | 4 May 2024
Stats
The primary programming language of fsl.software is HTML.
Sponsored