searx-instances VS adm-zip

I still recommend a Searx instance over google. Independently run search engines using an open-source software that aggregate searches over multiple engines, including Google, Bing, Yahoo, Wikipedia, DDG, Ecosia, and many many more.

This kind of thing is why I use searx

I recommend hopping on public SearxNG instances. https://searx.space/

This was my default search in Safari, the "new tab opens with" way.

Now it shows "Cloud provider terminated all my servers, service is down for the moment. Working on it. Sorry. Please use other instances on https://searx.space"

Assuming you don't publicly list this instance on searx.space, you should be fine with a small vps. I don't see this thing having more than a dozen concurrent users so I wouldn't bother with a vps larger than 2gb of ram and 2 cpu . This should cost less than 10-20 bucks a month on vultr or digitalocean. Then you just need a domain, which can be as little as like 8 bucks a year depends on where you get it. So I'd estimate it would cost 80-120 a year to run.

If anyone is interested in getting around search related privacy issues, look into a public SearXNG instance. It doesn't mitigate all privacy concerns but does a lot to move in that direction.

Try SearXNG (https://searx.space/)

If you want to try it out before creating your own, check out https://searx.space/

"dependencies": { "@next/font": "^13.0.7", "@stripe/stripe-js": "^1.35.0", "@supabase/gotrue-js": "^1.22.22", "@supabase/supabase-js": "^1.35.3", "adm-zip": "https://github.com/cthackers/adm-zip/tarball/master", "archiver": "^5.3.1", "aws-sdk": "^2.1300.0", "axios": "^0.27.2", "body-scroll-lock": "^4.0.0-beta.0", "chart.js": "^3.9.1", "color-contrast-checker": "^2.1.0", "cookie": "^0.5.0", "date-fns": "^2.29.2", "file-saver": "^2.0.5", "fs-extra": "^10.1.0", "get-contrast-ratio": "^0.2.1", "hex-rgb": "^5.0.0", "html-react-parser": "^3.0.4", "js-file-download": "^0.4.12", "jszip": "^3.10.0", "mongodb": "^4.7.0", "next": "^13.0.7", "next-connect": "^0.13.0", "next-markdown": "^1.8.0", "next-themes": "^0.0.15", "node-stream-zip": "^1.15.0", "query-string": "^7.1.1", "react": "^18.2.0", "react-chartjs-2": "^4.3.1", "react-color-palette": "^6.2.0", "react-colorful": "^5.6.1", "react-dom": "^18.2.0", "stripe": "^10.6.0", "svg-loaders": "^0.2.0", "swr": "^2.0.0", "tailwindcss-autofill": "^1.0.2", "tailwindcss-shadow-fill": "^1.0.1", "tailwindcss-text-fill": "^0.2.0", "uuid": "^9.0.0"

Adm Zip

Click here to find more about the adm-zip package.

> Especially considering "admzip" is a misspelling as you admit?

I don't think this is true. A quick look at https://github.com/cthackers/adm-zip

> var zip = new AdmZip("./my_file.zip");

It's entirely possible that a person could be querying the exact variable name "admzip" for a variety results that should only be code snippets of the by-convention "AdmZip" variable name with no concern for the package name "adm-zip".

I know this could be a case because I do this kind of programmatic search all the time, and in fact I remember specifically searching the web for "AdmZip" and not "adm-zip" a few years ago.