adm-zip VS uBlock-Origin-dev-filter

"dependencies": { "@next/font": "^13.0.7", "@stripe/stripe-js": "^1.35.0", "@supabase/gotrue-js": "^1.22.22", "@supabase/supabase-js": "^1.35.3", "adm-zip": "https://github.com/cthackers/adm-zip/tarball/master", "archiver": "^5.3.1", "aws-sdk": "^2.1300.0", "axios": "^0.27.2", "body-scroll-lock": "^4.0.0-beta.0", "chart.js": "^3.9.1", "color-contrast-checker": "^2.1.0", "cookie": "^0.5.0", "date-fns": "^2.29.2", "file-saver": "^2.0.5", "fs-extra": "^10.1.0", "get-contrast-ratio": "^0.2.1", "hex-rgb": "^5.0.0", "html-react-parser": "^3.0.4", "js-file-download": "^0.4.12", "jszip": "^3.10.0", "mongodb": "^4.7.0", "next": "^13.0.7", "next-connect": "^0.13.0", "next-markdown": "^1.8.0", "next-themes": "^0.0.15", "node-stream-zip": "^1.15.0", "query-string": "^7.1.1", "react": "^18.2.0", "react-chartjs-2": "^4.3.1", "react-color-palette": "^6.2.0", "react-colorful": "^5.6.1", "react-dom": "^18.2.0", "stripe": "^10.6.0", "svg-loaders": "^0.2.0", "swr": "^2.0.0", "tailwindcss-autofill": "^1.0.2", "tailwindcss-shadow-fill": "^1.0.1", "tailwindcss-text-fill": "^0.2.0", "uuid": "^9.0.0"

Adm Zip

Click here to find more about the adm-zip package.

> Especially considering "admzip" is a misspelling as you admit?

I don't think this is true. A quick look at https://github.com/cthackers/adm-zip

> var zip = new AdmZip("./my_file.zip");

It's entirely possible that a person could be querying the exact variable name "admzip" for a variety results that should only be code snippets of the by-convention "AdmZip" variable name with no concern for the package name "adm-zip".

I know this could be a case because I do this kind of programmatic search all the time, and in fact I remember specifically searching the web for "AdmZip" and not "adm-zip" a few years ago.

I'm not OP, but here is my own uBlock filter with hundreds of GitHub/StackOverflow copycats: https://github.com/quenhus/uBlock-Origin-dev-filter

This is really the core of my disappointment in Google: their poor handling of malicious SEO. Having humans go over shared site blocklists that people use to improve results, hand verify each entry, and remove those sites from Google results would go a long, long way.

I'm talking about lists like these: https://github.com/quenhus/uBlock-Origin-dev-filter/blob/mai...

It wouldn't take a small team more than a few weeks to get through these lists -- most of the work has already been done.

I'm not OP, but for those of you who saw this comment and were hoping for a link, the one that I use is https://github.com/quenhus/uBlock-Origin-dev-filter

I reported the issue at https://github.com/quenhus/uBlock-Origin-dev-filter/issues/348.

There is a community-maintained list of these stackoverflow / github / npm / wikipedia clones, and filters to hide them from search results: https://github.com/quenhus/uBlock-Origin-dev-filter

These lists are supported as presets in https://letsblock.it/filters/search-results

I've been using this uBO filter since someone recommended on a different thread and it's been great at removing those annoying sites from search results: https://github.com/quenhus/uBlock-Origin-dev-filter

The filter has presets at the bottom of the settings form, sourced from data from the https://github.com/quenhus/uBlock-Origin-dev-filter project.