sdoc VS Ruby on Rails

Once you feel comfortable with both Ruby and Rails, try building a few simple apps on your own by reading the Rails Guides and browsing the Rails API whenever you're stuck.

Hi. I'm a self-taught Ruby on Rails programmer. I have a question about the documentation at https://api.rubyonrails.org. On many of the pages, you'll see methods and their details. Below that, you'll often see examples using different options. This is where I have a question. An example might look like this:

If a method isn't documented in https://api.rubyonrails.org/ it shouldn't be used as we reserve the right to remove or change them at any point.

Rails still holds the top spot in getting things out the door in the shortest amount of time. So many example projects and tons of amazing libraries that are available. They absolutely have the best developer docs in the industry as far as I'm concerned.

https://guides.rubyonrails.org/

https://api.rubyonrails.org/

Phoenix/Liveview is a close second. I would personally use Phoenix/Liveview at this point because since I know that stack pretty well, but it is definitely not as easy as Rails to learn. However, once past the learning phase I think there's distinct advantages especially with Liveview.

Fly.io has a free hosting tier currently. You can also get some free servers through Oracle Cloud.

https://api.rubyonrails.org is your best friend. Check the docs before googling. Instant access to the source of functions. ApiDock is shit but continuously gets to the top of google search results.

For something more in-depth, besides the Rails Guides that have been mentioned already, you could also use the Rails API docs as a reference.

Yeah visit guides.rubyonrails.org if you want to see how to do a particular thing like validations and stuff and use this website https://api.rubyonrails.org/ for seeing method definitions their options etc.. These two websites pretty much conver everything. I specially use the second on pretty frequently. Also I think sublime text is better for ruby on rails than vs code but thats personal preference. The ruby doc website is pretty good to for documentation on rubies standard classes. Like if you are looking for some method to do something for a string you can just search string ruby and this comes up first, it contains all public methods for these classes and is pretty useful.

If you mean the Rails API Documentation, I mainly use it when I use a method I'm not familiar with (eg trying to adapt a StackOverflow suggestion).

Industry adoption - Without including the adoption of other popular and more established frameworks like Python, React, C#, and others, if we consider the adoption of Ruby frameworks, Rails easily eclipses Hanami. The Rails homepage lists some big-name organizations using the framework. On the other hand, as the new kid on the block, Hanami is not so widely adopted. We'll have to wait and see whether that will change in the future.

on April 23, 2024, a PR #51640 was merged into main branch of Ruby On Rails. This PR title is Use Module#include rather than prepend for faster method lookup.

[0] is a my favorite demonstration of it.

[0]: https://github.com/rails/rails/commit/b83965785db1eec019edf1...

Here's a real life example: Imagine a Ruby on Rails app on which a team of developers are working. The code is hosted on GitLab and all the work is coordinated using GitLab issues. In other words: For every commit, there's an associated issue and the issue number acts as a sort of primary key for documentation, time reporting and so forth. This convention has a few advantages, most notably the ability to easily learn more about how, when and by whom features were implemented as well as how this implementation came to be.

Ruby on Rails is regarded as one of the best ruby frameworks. It was the primary language in developing big projects such as Twitter and helped the language boost the community. Often referred to as “Rails,” Ruby on Rails is a web development framework with an MVC control structure and currently running its 6.1 version. The 16-year-old language has dramatically influenced the web development structures and managing databases, web pages, and other components on a web application.

In Rails 7.1, a new option _instance_methods is introduced, allowing developers to opt-out of the automatic generation of instance methods for enums. When enum is defined with _instance_methods: false, Rails will no longer generate methods like pending?, processed?, etc.

Rails isn't super opinionated about database writes, its mostly left up to developers to discover that for relational DBs you do not want to be doing a bunch of small writes all at once.

That said it specifically has tools to address this that started appearing a few years ago https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/35077

The way my team handles it is to stick Kafka in between whats generating the records (for us, a bunch of web scraping workers) and and a consumer that pulls off the Kafka queue and runs an insert when its internal buffer reaches around 50k rows.

Rails is also looking to add some more direct background type work with https://github.com/basecamp/solid_queue but this is still very new - most larger Rails shops are going to be running a second system and a gem called Sidekiq that pulls jobs out of Redis.

I'm looking forward to see what extractions from this will land on rails. For example: https://github.com/rails/rails/issues/50454

Here is what strict_loading does (source):

Kamal is a wonderfully simple way to deploy your applications anywhere. It will also be included by default in Rails 8. Kamal is trivial, but I don’t recommend using it on your development machine.