stable-diffusion-webui VS diffusers

[https://github.com/sd-webui/stable-diffusion-webui/wiki/installation de numéro(https://github.com/sd-webui/stable-diffusion-webui/wiki/installation)

https://github.com/sd-webui/stable-diffusion-webui (prend beaucoup à installer)

you can "animate" with stable diffusion usining text to video https://github.com/nateraw/stable-diffusion-videos or https://github.com/sd-webui/stable-diffusion-webui

I mentioned Automatic1111 on SD-WEBUI and they deleted the comment. I guess this is why. My installation failed on SD-WEBUI and there was no solution for me. I suspect that's why Automatic1111's fork is so popular. He went above and beyond to make sure people with 1660ti's could run SD flawlessly with all the different tools available.

Any way to convert a .pt model to a .ckpt model? Stable-diffusion-webui only seems to support the second type of file but just renaming them does not work:

This is Stable-Diffusion. Here is a UI version https://github.com/sd-webui/stable-diffusion-webui

I dunno about the app. I use this https://github.com/sd-webui/stable-diffusion-webui it's very resource hungry though.

Haven't tried this GUI yet. Can anyone chime in about how it compares to Automatic1111's and sd-webui/HLKY's? There are so many good repos out there that it's getting hard to keep track of them all

Maybe those who joined were not aware that they joined the horde :-)

I'm missing something about the random factor, from the sample code from https://github.com/huggingface/diffusers/blob/main/README.md

Hey people, I noticed that combining these two methods in a single forward pass increases the controllability of the generation quite a bit. I was kind of puzzled that sometimes ControlNet yielded better results than T2IAdapter for some cases, and sometimes it was the other way around, so I decided to test both at the same time, and results were quite nice. Some visuals and more motivation here: https://github.com/huggingface/diffusers/issues/5847 And it was already merged here: https://github.com/huggingface/diffusers/pull/5869

Open Parti Prompts: The better way to evaluate diffusion models (repo)

You have disabled the safety checker for by passing `safety_checker=None`. Ensure that you abide to the conditions of the Stable Diffusion license and do not expose unfiltered results in services or applications open to the public. Both the diffusers team and Hugging Face strongly recommend to keep the safety filter enabled in all public facing circumstances, disabling it only for use-cases that involve analyzing network behavior or auditing its results. For more information, please have a look at https://github.com/huggingface/diffusers/pull/254 .

For developers, TensorRT support also exists for the diffusers library via community pipelines. [1] It's limited, but if you're only supporting a subset of features, it can help.

In general, these insane speed boosts comes at the cost of bleeding edge features.

[1] https://github.com/huggingface/diffusers/blob/28e8d1f6ec82a6...

I was training sdxl UNET base model, with the diffusers library, which was going great until around step 210k when the weights suddenly turned back to their original values and stayed that way. I also tried with the ema version, which didn't change at all. I also looked at the tensor's weight values directly which confirmed my suspicions.

Merging LoRAs is essentially taking a weighted average of the LoRA adapter weights. It's more common in other UIs.

diffusers is working on a PR for it: https://github.com/huggingface/diffusers/pull/4473