diffusers VS Dreambooth-Stable-Diffusion

I'm missing something about the random factor, from the sample code from https://github.com/huggingface/diffusers/blob/main/README.md

Hey people, I noticed that combining these two methods in a single forward pass increases the controllability of the generation quite a bit. I was kind of puzzled that sometimes ControlNet yielded better results than T2IAdapter for some cases, and sometimes it was the other way around, so I decided to test both at the same time, and results were quite nice. Some visuals and more motivation here: https://github.com/huggingface/diffusers/issues/5847 And it was already merged here: https://github.com/huggingface/diffusers/pull/5869

Open Parti Prompts: The better way to evaluate diffusion models (repo)

You have disabled the safety checker for by passing `safety_checker=None`. Ensure that you abide to the conditions of the Stable Diffusion license and do not expose unfiltered results in services or applications open to the public. Both the diffusers team and Hugging Face strongly recommend to keep the safety filter enabled in all public facing circumstances, disabling it only for use-cases that involve analyzing network behavior or auditing its results. For more information, please have a look at https://github.com/huggingface/diffusers/pull/254 .

For developers, TensorRT support also exists for the diffusers library via community pipelines. [1] It's limited, but if you're only supporting a subset of features, it can help.

In general, these insane speed boosts comes at the cost of bleeding edge features.

[1] https://github.com/huggingface/diffusers/blob/28e8d1f6ec82a6...

I was training sdxl UNET base model, with the diffusers library, which was going great until around step 210k when the weights suddenly turned back to their original values and stayed that way. I also tried with the ema version, which didn't change at all. I also looked at the tensor's weight values directly which confirmed my suspicions.

Merging LoRAs is essentially taking a weighted average of the LoRA adapter weights. It's more common in other UIs.

diffusers is working on a PR for it: https://github.com/huggingface/diffusers/pull/4473

Tons of stuff here, no? https://github.com/JoePenna/Dreambooth-Stable-Diffusion/

Joe Penna's Dreambooth (Tutorial|24GB) Most popular DB repo with great results.

1) The https://github.com/JoePenna/Dreambooth-Stable-Diffusion instructions say to use the 1.5 checkpoints - is that the latest? Can I use the 2+ models or?

I quickly turned to the second library, https://github.com/JoePenna/Dreambooth-Stable-Diffusion, because its readme was very encouraging, and its results were the best. Unfortunately, to use it on Colab, you need to sign up for Colab Pro to use advanced GPUs (at least 24GB of VRAM), and training a model requires at least 14 compute units. As a poor Chinese person, I could only buy Colab Pro from a proxy. The results from JoePenna/Dreambooth-Stable-Diffusion were fantastic, and the preparation was straightforward, requiring only <=20 512*512 photos without writing captions. I used it to create many beautiful photos.

I've found EveryDream to be brilliant and have switched from JoePenna's Dreambooth because I've found I get better results so long as I provide good captions for all the images, even if preparing the dataset takes 3x as long (took me 2 hours to crop and label the 54 images).

From what I know you can train with whatever size you want. But you need software that will support it. For example, ShivamShrirao/diffusers repo seems to allow a change of dimension. Also, you need HW that would support the training, because bigger images need more VRAM, for example,Joe Penna repo is using ~23GB with 512x512px so probably it's not a valid option. But the ShivamShrirao repo has optimizations that allow to run it with less VRAM.

This is a good starting place: https://github.com/JoePenna/Dreambooth-Stable-Diffusion