ruby-slim
Zato
ruby-slim | Zato | |
---|---|---|
1 | 3 | |
0 | 1,072 | |
- | - | |
4.1 | 9.9 | |
9 months ago | 8 days ago | |
Ruby | Python | |
MIT License | GNU Affero General Public License v3.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
ruby-slim
-
We Should Have Markdown Rendered Websites
I like Markdown and use it at work, but I think Asciidoc is a better markup language because it is more consistent and has support for more things than Markdown does (e.g., better table support, callouts, tips, etc.).
I currently use 11ty with the Asciidoc plugin for building websites. This setup is nice because I only have to fiddle with HTML and CSS during the design phase. Once that's done, nearly all my website maintenance is done in Asciidoc. Easy!
I don't think I'd want to directly write an entire website in either Markdown or Asciidoc. I think, eventually, doing so would result in these markup languages becoming as cluttered and weird as the HTML/DOM/JavaScript/CSS mess is now.
I think a better step to improving HTML and CSS would be to have the browsers support Slim (https://github.com/deepin-community/ruby-slim) and Sass out of the box instead. That would make my design phase less wordy and redundant while keeping my Asciidoc experience nice and tidy.
Zato
-
We Should Have Markdown Rendered Websites
Yes, the article is correct, there is a market for Markdown sites and related products.
Our Zato website is in Markdown: https://zato.io
We have a purpose-built static site generator, which makes sense in our case because:
* The resulting site is very fast, seeing as there is no need for runtime generation of any assets / HTML / any kind of resources
* It is easier for developers to work on documentation because they already know Markdown
* It is easy to statically apply filters such as spell checkers for multiple languages during the build
* Various optimizations can be applied, e.g. incremental builds or on-demand builds
The drawbacks are:
* Non-technical translators may have a difficult time working with anything but either their own specialized tools or MS Word and they consider Markdown to be "advanced"
* Sometimes you work with writers who are not technical at all and who will not understand what a build system is even if they are open to the idea of learning Markdown itself
Thus, there is a market for a lightweight CMS that would enable non-technical people to author Markdown in their browsers, without a need for any command line usage.
- Open-Source ESB, API, AI and Cloud Integrations in Python
- Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA)
What are some alternatives?
raito - Mini Markdown Wiki/CMS in 8kb of JavaScript
pycon
mdx - Markdown for the component era
python-fints - Pure-python FinTS (formerly known as HBCI) implementation
easy-hugo-blog - A template repo of Hugo blog for an easy and quick start.
okuna-api - 🤖 The Okuna Social Network API
python-n26 - 💵 Unofficial Python client for n26 (Number 26) - https://n26.com/
scroll - Tools for thought. A language for bloggers. This repo contains the language and a static site generator command line app.
Alerta - Alerta monitoring system
abna - Python library to automatically retrieve mutations from ABN Amro
mlapi - An easy to use/extend object recognition API you can locally install. Python+Flask. Also works with ZMES!
djot - A light markup language