ruby-cff VS citelang

Compare ruby-cff vs citelang and see what are their differences.

Our great sponsors
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
ruby-cff citelang
1 1
47 8
- -
4.4 0.0
2 months ago over 1 year ago
Ruby Python
Apache License 2.0 Mozilla Public License 2.0
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

ruby-cff

Posts with mentions or reviews of ruby-cff. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects.
  • Enhanced support for citations on GitHub | The GitHub Blog
    1 project | /r/programming | 21 Aug 2021
    So the date accessed is the entire year of 2021. It includes the version, at least, but not an actual Git hash, so it really only applies if you use a released version. And then only if they keep their cff file updated, because that isn't actually automatic -- the version is just another field checked in with this file, alongside "date released".

citelang

Posts with mentions or reviews of citelang. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-05-16.
  • Tell us about your projects as an RSE!
    4 projects | /r/ResearchSoftwareEng | 16 May 2022
    I'm interested in rethinking how we get credit for our work, specifically I don't want it to be entirely based around publication, and I want nested dependencies taken into account! The library I'm working on for that is citelang https://github.com/vsoch/citelang and I have an automated weekly analysis that uses it https://rseng.github.io/rsepedia-analysis/. These are mostly static tools and I'm looking to develop more dynamic ones (e.g., a server).

What are some alternatives?

When comparing ruby-cff and citelang you can also consider the following projects:

citation-file-format - The Citation File Format lets you provide citation metadata for software or datasets in plaintext files that are easy to read by both humans and machines.

singularity-hpc - Local filesystem registry for containers (intended for HPC) using Lmod or Environment Modules. Works for users and admins.

FinancePy - A Python Finance Library that focuses on the pricing and risk-management of Financial Derivatives, including fixed-income, equity, FX and credit derivatives.

Auto-Research - Generate custom detailed survey paper with topic clustered sections and proper citations, from just a single query in just under 30 mins !!

feedparser - feedparser gem - (universal) web feed parser and normalizer (XML w/ Atom or RSS, JSON Feed, HTML w/ Microformats e.g. h-entry/h-feed or Feed.HTML, Feed.TXT w/ YAML, JSON or INI & Markdown, etc.)

ruby-advisory-db - A database of vulnerable Ruby Gems

Shrine - File Attachment toolkit for Ruby applications

QuickStore - Simple local key-value store based on YAML::Store.