ruby-cff VS Shrine

Compare ruby-cff vs Shrine and see what are their differences.

Our great sponsors
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
ruby-cff Shrine
1 7
47 3,142
- 0.4%
4.4 5.7
2 months ago 22 days ago
Ruby Ruby
Apache License 2.0 MIT License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

ruby-cff

Posts with mentions or reviews of ruby-cff. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects.
  • Enhanced support for citations on GitHub | The GitHub Blog
    1 project | /r/programming | 21 Aug 2021
    So the date accessed is the entire year of 2021. It includes the version, at least, but not an actual Git hash, so it really only applies if you use a released version. And then only if they keep their cff file updated, because that isn't actually automatic -- the version is just another field checked in with this file, alongside "date released".

Shrine

Posts with mentions or reviews of Shrine. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-07-05.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing ruby-cff and Shrine you can also consider the following projects:

citation-file-format - The Citation File Format lets you provide citation metadata for software or datasets in plaintext files that are easy to read by both humans and machines.

CarrierWave - Classier solution for file uploads for Rails, Sinatra and other Ruby web frameworks