qc-hash VS gtl

Compare qc-hash vs gtl and see what are their differences.

InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
www.influxdata.com
featured
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured
qc-hash gtl
1 5
10 90
- -
5.7 7.1
8 months ago 28 days ago
C++ C++
MIT License Apache License 2.0
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

qc-hash

Posts with mentions or reviews of qc-hash. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-06-16.

gtl

Posts with mentions or reviews of gtl. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-07-07.
  • Inside boost::concurrent_flat_map
    4 projects | /r/cpp | 7 Jul 2023
    gtl library author here. Very nice writeup! Reading it made me think, and I believe I know why gtl::parallel_flat_hash_map performs comparatively worse for high-skew scenarios (just pushed a fix in gtl).
  • Boost 1.81 will have boost::unordered_flat_map...
    6 projects | /r/cpp | 31 Oct 2022
    I do this as well in my phmap and gtl implementations. It makes the tables look worse in benchmarks like the above, but prevents really bad surprises occasionally.
  • Comprehensive C++ Hashmap Benchmarks 2022
    3 projects | /r/cpp | 7 Sep 2022
    Thanks a lot for the great benchmark, Martin. Glad you used different hash functions, because I do sacrifice some speed to make sure that the performance of my hash maps doesn't degrade drastically with poor hash functions. Happy to see that my phmap and gtl (the C++20 version) performed well.
  • It is now trivial to cache pure functions with highly efficient, concurrent cache.
    1 project | /r/cpp | 3 Jul 2022
    This is very easy to do with the latest version of gtl. And it is extremely efficient, as the caching mechanism uses the parallel hashmap, which internally is divided into N submaps each with its own mutex, reducing mutex contention to a minimum.
  • Updating map_benchmarks: Send your hashmaps!
    13 projects | /r/cpp | 16 Jun 2022
    AFAIK sparsepp has been dropped entirely in favor of the containers in GTL: https://github.com/greg7mdp/gtl

What are some alternatives?

When comparing qc-hash and gtl you can also consider the following projects:

CppPerformanceBenchmarks

eytzinger - Cache-friendly associative STL-like container with an Eytzinger (BFS) layout for C++

dense_hash_map - A simple replacement for std::unordered_map

fph-table - Flash Perfect Hash Table: an implementation of a dynamic perfect hash table, extremely fast for lookup

Google Test - GoogleTest - Google Testing and Mocking Framework

google-sparsehash - Clone of google-sparsehash

flat_hash_map - A very fast hashtable

recursive-variant - Recursive Variant: A simple library for Recursive Variant Types

libcudacxx - [ARCHIVED] The C++ Standard Library for your entire system. See https://github.com/NVIDIA/cccl