pyteal VS v1-contracts

Compare pyteal vs v1-contracts and see what are their differences.

Our great sponsors
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
pyteal v1-contracts
5 2
278 362
2.5% -
5.3 0.0
about 1 month ago about 3 years ago
Python Python
MIT License GNU General Public License v3.0 only
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

pyteal

Posts with mentions or reviews of pyteal. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-01-15.

v1-contracts

Posts with mentions or reviews of v1-contracts. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-03-30.
  • Are there any interesting projects that are backed by "small" smart contracts?
    3 projects | /r/ethdev | 30 Mar 2021
  • Ethereum Isn't Fun Anymore
    7 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 22 Feb 2021
    If you're working on "large Ethereum smart contracts" you've missed the point. On chain logic should always be as minimal as possible. Uniswap v1 was two vyper files. One was 46 lines, and the other was 496 lines[1]. It took like 20 minutes to read through the code thoroughly, and was one of the most impactful contracts ever deployed to the network.

    Solidity also matured a lot, which is why Uniswap v2 moved back. If you find yourself writing an EVM assembler from scratch, and you're trying to build something other than a compiler, you have veered way way off course, and need to re-evaluate your system architecture.

    Feature creep might work well if you're trying to leech money from a government contract or something, or being paid by line of code you contribute, but it's fatal in the Ethereum world. I consulted for a number of projects that made the exact same mistake, and most of them aren't around anymore.

    [1] https://github.com/Uniswap/uniswap-v1/tree/master/contracts

What are some alternatives?

When comparing pyteal and v1-contracts you can also consider the following projects:

mythril - Security analysis tool for EVM bytecode. Supports smart contracts built for Ethereum, Hedera, Quorum, Vechain, Rootstock, Tron and other EVM-compatible blockchains.

v2-periphery - ๐ŸŽš Peripheral smart contracts for interacting with Uniswap V2

go-algorand - Algorand's official implementation in Go.

homebrew-golem - Golem is creating a global market for computing power.

algorand-ballet - A qualitative analysis tool for the Algorand blockchain

uniswap-v2-periphery - ๐ŸŽš Peripheral smart contracts for interacting with Uniswap V2 [Moved to: https://github.com/Uniswap/v2-periphery]

0xDeCA10B - Sharing Updatable Models (SUM) on Blockchain

dfktools - Interact with the contracts of DefiKingdoms

dipdup - Modular framework for creating selective indexers and featureful backends for dapps

quadrable - Authenticated multi-version database: sparse binary merkle tree with compact partial-tree proofs

lbry-sdk - The LBRY SDK for building decentralized, censorship resistant, monetized, digital content apps.

solana - Web-Scale Blockchain for fast, secure, scalable, decentralized apps and marketplaces.