pynguin VS lxml

https://swagger.io/specification/ https://github.com/se2p/pynguin

I would use black to reformat this, then, if you can't refactor/rewrite (which is a lot of work!) I would try automated test generation via something like pynguin or fuzzing. I mean … this is not going to be a reliable solution anyways if the codebase is like that. So I would go in a direction that I find interesting to learn about and that could be helpful for the project. That would be generating tests and doing fuzzing. In the end you should run some linters anyways so that you can justify your results and show that the task is not in the scope of an internship and needs extensive refactoring.

The main difference that Klara bring to the table, compared to similar tool like pynguin and Crosshair is that the analysis is entirely static, meaning that no user code will be executed, and you can easily extend the test generation strategy via plugin loading (e.g. the options arg to the Component object returned from function above is not needed for test coverage).

Automated White-box test generation software: * https://github.com/EMResearch/EvoMaster -- for integration tests. * https://github.com/se2p/pynguin, https://pynguin.readthedocs.io/en/latest/user/quickstart.html -- unit test generation for python

Pynguin – Generate Python unit tests automatically\ (60 comments)

lxml

Parsel is a library build to extract data from XML/HTML documents with XPath and CSS selectors support, and could be combined with regular expressions. It's usees lxml parser under the hood by default.

So, now that I no longer work in that industry, and I had some free time, I created a lazy parsing package using lxml instead of the xml parser in the standard library, which can help people who want to have a python only parsing solution.

Seriously, use LXML.

I got curious about this now so I did some tests on my own, and it appears that the XML parser implementation in Python does indeed strip all newline characters from attributes. Whether this is according to XML standard I do not know; I also briefly tried an alternative XML implementation for Python and it behaves the same, so I would assume that this is standard behavior, but I'm not knowledgable enough about XML to say for certain.

I use lxml for the XML parsing and pyodbc as the ODBC library. We have a small team so I just keep it as simple as possible: 1. A cursor yields the XML documents from a SQL query as a stream 2. A generator function parses the XML document and yields the rows (you could parallelize this step) 3. Stream each of the resulting rows to a single CSV file 4. Scoop up the resulting CSV file into the target database (usually with the DB engine's loader; bulk insert isn't so fast over ODBC) It ends up being a straight forward, low-overhead approach.

If that sounds too weird maybe take a look at pycomm3, python also has lxml as well as requests. You could write a script that retrieves the data from the clx using the appropriate pycomm3 driver for cplx and then do xml things with the data using lxml and transmit the data over http using requests.