pull-request-stats VS tubesync

And if the quality of the code is a rather difficult thing to calculate, then the quality and speed of reviewing of pull requests can be calculated. In our company, we started using a pull request stats package that integrates with github actions and publishes review statistics directly in pull requests. But we had some issues and incorrect calculations.

Hence my suggestion, if your product saves me $500/seat/month then I'll gladly pay $50/seat/month.

Wordpress is a great example, rather than build another Wordpress, solve one problem Wordpress doesn't solve (example: Elementor) and do it far better (depth vs breadth).

We are using this Github Action (https://github.com/flowwer-dev/pull-request-stats) for now, it adds stats to every PR, it has helped the team visualize their contributions and how critical it was for us moving forward and as a manager/tech-lead it helps me identify areas of improvements at the individual level. I think it's a simple idea with a lot of depth.

A Github action to print relevant stats about the pull request reviewers in team: https://github.com/flowwer-dev/pull-request-stats

https://github.com/meeb/tubesync

It will automatically download new videos from any public channel or playlist.

When I tried to do that with TubeSync (https://github.com/meeb/tubesync) I got this error and the container would be "unhealthy" and never start.

tubesync

Quelqu'un d'autre utilise-t-il TupesYnc? https://github.com/meeb/tubesync

Someone mentioned "TubeSync" earlier in the thread, for the sonarr-equivalent of subscribing to YouTube channels. Not what I was after but sounds like what you want :)

this one, right? https://github.com/meeb/tubesync

Check out Tubearchvist or something like ytdl-sub or Tube Sync paired with a media player like Jellyfin.

Check out TubeSync.