profligate VS field_names

Compare profligate vs field_names and see what are their differences.

profligate

Caesar cipher library with automatic letter-frequency decryption. (by oreganoli)
Suggest topics
Source Code
Suggest alternative
Edit details

field_names

proc-macro for accessing struct field names at runtime (by TedDriggs)
Rust proc-macro
Source Code
Suggest alternative
Edit details
WorkOS
Our great sponsors
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
Our great sponsors
profligate field_names
1 2
0 37
- -
0.0 0.0
about 3 years ago over 2 years ago
Rust Rust
- MIT License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

profligate

Posts with mentions or reviews of profligate. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-03-01.

field_names

Posts with mentions or reviews of field_names. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-03-01.
  • Trick for keeping fields of two structs in sync
    1 project | /r/rust | 2 Mar 2022
    PS: The rename protection here requires that the field types are completely identical between the two. If you need to do Into or AsRef conversions, this will still catch field addition and removal, but you may need to add a unit-test that uses something like field_names.
  • What's everyone working on this week (9/2021)?
    11 projects | /r/rust | 1 Mar 2021
    I've added a test/example to the field_names showing how it can be used to keep two structs' fields in sync (source code). This solved a problem I was having where edits to one struct risked breaking deserialization if the same change wasn't applied to a second struct.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing profligate and field_names you can also consider the following projects:

azure-sdk-for-rust - This repository is for active development of the *unofficial* Azure SDK for Rust. This repository is *not* supported by the Azure SDK team.

mp4 - MP4 library, CLI tool, server

tab-rs - The intuitive, config-driven terminal multiplexer designed for software & systems engineers

rust-fsm - Finite state machine framework for Rust with readable specifications

objstor - object store

negate - Attribute macro that generates negated versions of`is_something` functions

clearshell - A shell environment built with the goal of being simple, clean, and easy to use

rustfuif - Performance & correctness oriented beursfuif implementation in rust

Bytecode - A Rust proc-macro crate which derives functions to compile and parse back enums and structs to and from a bytecode representation

uom - Units of measurement -- type-safe zero-cost dimensional analysis

profligate vs azure-sdk-for-rust field_names vs mp4 profligate vs tab-rs field_names vs rust-fsm profligate vs objstor field_names vs negate profligate vs clearshell field_names vs azure-sdk-for-rust profligate vs rustfuif field_names vs Bytecode profligate vs uom field_names vs rustfuif