field_names VS negate

Compare field_names vs negate and see what are their differences.

field_names

proc-macro for accessing struct field names at runtime (by TedDriggs)
Rust proc-macro
Source Code
Suggest alternative
Edit details

negate

Attribute macro that generates negated versions of`is_something` functions (by vrmiguel)
Rust rust-lang Macro proc-macro proc-macro-attributes
Source Code
crates.io
Suggest alternative
Edit details
InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
www.influxdata.com
featured
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured
field_names negate
2 1
37 9
- -
0.0 0.0
over 2 years ago over 2 years ago
Rust Rust
MIT License MIT License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

field_names

Posts with mentions or reviews of field_names. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-03-01.
  • Trick for keeping fields of two structs in sync
    1 project | /r/rust | 2 Mar 2022
    PS: The rename protection here requires that the field types are completely identical between the two. If you need to do Into or AsRef conversions, this will still catch field addition and removal, but you may need to add a unit-test that uses something like field_names.
  • What's everyone working on this week (9/2021)?
    11 projects | /r/rust | 1 Mar 2021
    I've added a test/example to the field_names showing how it can be used to keep two structs' fields in sync (source code). This solved a problem I was having where edits to one struct risked breaking deserialization if the same change wasn't applied to a second struct.

negate

Posts with mentions or reviews of negate. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing field_names and negate you can also consider the following projects:

mp4 - MP4 library, CLI tool, server

syn-file-expand - Rust library to scan files and expand (make modules inline) multi-file crates source code as a single tree.

rust-fsm - Finite state machine framework for Rust with readable specifications

multiversion - Easy function multiversioning for Rust

azure-sdk-for-rust - This repository is for active development of the *unofficial* Azure SDK for Rust. This repository is *not* supported by the Azure SDK team.

throttle_my_fn - A Rust attribute macro to limit a function's number of runs over a specified period of time

Bytecode - A Rust proc-macro crate which derives functions to compile and parse back enums and structs to and from a bytecode representation

maud - :pencil: Compile-time HTML templates for Rust

rustfuif - Performance & correctness oriented beursfuif implementation in rust

syn - Parser for Rust source code

profligate - Caesar cipher library with automatic letter-frequency decryption.

Constime - Zig's comptime for Rust. Mostly something to play around with until more stuff is `const` fn.

field_names vs mp4 negate vs syn-file-expand field_names vs rust-fsm negate vs multiversion field_names vs azure-sdk-for-rust negate vs throttle_my_fn field_names vs Bytecode negate vs maud field_names vs rustfuif negate vs syn field_names vs profligate negate vs Constime