picohttpparser VS liburing

Compare picohttpparser vs liburing and see what are their differences.

InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
www.influxdata.com
featured
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured
picohttpparser liburing
3 28
1,785 2,589
0.6% -
4.2 9.6
2 months ago 7 days ago
C C
- MIT License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

picohttpparser

Posts with mentions or reviews of picohttpparser. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-12-18.
  • Ask HN: Resources for Building a Webserver in C?
    10 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 18 Dec 2022
  • Linux Kernel vs. DPDK: HTTP Performance Showdown
    5 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 4 Jul 2022
    Yea, it is definitely a fake HTTP server which I acknowledge in the article [1]. However based on the size of the requests, and my observation of the number of packets per second being symmetrical at the network interface level, I didn't have a concern about doubled responses.

    Skipping the parsing of the HTTP requests definitely gives a performance boost, but for this comparison both sides got the same boost, so I didn't mind being less strict. Seastar's HTTP parser was being finicky, so I chose the easy route and just removed it from the equation.

    For reference though, in my previous post[2] libreactor was able to hit 1.2M req/s while fully parsing the HTTP requests using picohttpparser[3]. But that is still a very simple and highly optimized implementation. From what I recall when I played with disabling HTTP parsing in libreactor I got a performance boost of about 5%.

    1. https://talawah.io/blog/linux-kernel-vs-dpdk-http-performanc...

    2. https://talawah.io/blog/extreme-http-performance-tuning-one-...

    3. https://github.com/h2o/picohttpparser

  • JS faster than Rust?
    3 projects | /r/rust | 24 Feb 2021
    Just-js is not nodejs framework. It's sperate runtime and most of the http code is written using c/c++ (for example headers parsing logic is written using c and is using https://github.com/h2o/picohttpparser which is c library)

liburing

Posts with mentions or reviews of liburing. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-05-22.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing picohttpparser and liburing you can also consider the following projects:

ntex - framework for composable networking services

tokio-uring - An io_uring backed runtime for Rust

just - the only javascript runtime to hit no.1 on techempower :fire:

libevent - Event notification library

openonload - git import of openonload.org https://gist.github.com/majek/ae188ae72e63470652c9

libuv - Cross-platform asynchronous I/O

onload - OpenOnload high performance user-level network stack

io_uring-echo-server - io_uring echo server

epoll-server - C code for multithreaded multiplexing client socket connections across multiple threads (so its X connections per thread) uses epoll

linux-aio - How to use the Linux AIO feature

libreactor - Extendable event driven high performance C-abstractions

go - The Go programming language