phobos VS xtract

Compare phobos vs xtract and see what are their differences.


Efficient and expressive XML data-binding library for Scala (by Tinkoff)


A library to make it easy to deserialize XML to user types in scala (by lucidsoftware)
Our great sponsors
  • Scout APM - Less time debugging, more time building
  • SonarQube - Static code analysis for 29 languages.
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
phobos xtract
3 0
81 58
- -
8.0 0.0
1 day ago 11 months ago
Scala Scala
Apache License 2.0 Apache License 2.0
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.


Posts with mentions or reviews of phobos. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-05-27.


Posts with mentions or reviews of xtract. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects.

We haven't tracked posts mentioning xtract yet.
Tracking mentions began in Dec 2020.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing phobos and xtract you can also consider the following projects:

xml-spac - Handle streaming XML data with declarative, composable parsers

A Tour of Scala - The standard Scala XML library

scala-commons - AVSystem commons library for Scala

Wartremover - Flexible Scala code linting tool

jsoniter-scala - Scala macros for compile-time generation of safe and ultra-fast JSON codecs