paperai VS gpt4all

Nice project!

I've spent quite a lot of time in the medical/scientific literature space. With regards to LLMs, specifically RAG, how the data is chunked is quite important. With that, I have a couple projects that might be beneficial additions.

paperetl (https://github.com/neuml/paperetl) - supports parsing arXiv, PubMed and integrates with GROBID to handle parsing metadata and text from arbitrary papers.

paperai (https://github.com/neuml/paperai) - builds embeddings databases of medical/scientific papers. Supports LLM prompting, semantic workflows and vector search. Built with txtai (https://github.com/neuml/txtai).

While arbitrary chunking/splitting can work, I've found that integrating parsing that has knowledge of medical/scientific paper structure increases the overall accuracy and experience of downstream applications.

https://github.com/neuml/paperai

Disclaimer: I am the author of both

paperai | paperetl

action: translate input: txtai executes machine-learning workflows to transform data and build AI-powered semantic search applications. output: txtai exécute des workflows d'apprentissage automatique pour transformer les données et construire des applications de recherche sémantique alimentées par l'IA. action: translate input: Traditional search systems use keywords to find data output: Les systèmes de recherche traditionnels utilisent des mots-clés pour trouver des données action: summary input: https://github.com/neuml/txtai output: txtai executes machine-learning workflows to transform data and build AI-powered semantic search applications. Semantic search applications have an understanding of natural language and identify results that have the same meaning, not necessarily the same keywords. API bindings for JavaScript, Java, Rust and Go. Cloud-native architecture scales out with container orchestration systems (e. g. Kubernetes) action: summary input: https://github.com/neuml/paperai output: paperai is an AI-powered literature discovery and review engine for medical/scientific papers. Paperai was used to analyze the COVID-19 Open Research Dataset (CORD-19) paperai and NeuML have been recognized in the following articles: Cord-19 Kaggle Challenge Awards Machine-Learning Experts Delve Into 47,000 Papers on Coronavirus Family. real 0m22.478s user 0m13.776s sys 0m3.218s

I don’t know if Ollama can do this but https://gpt4all.io/ can.

Gpt4all is a local desktop app with a Python API that can be trained on your documents: https://gpt4all.io/

The readme page is cryptic. What does 'mature' mean in this context? What is the sample text a continuation of?

Hving a gif the thing in use would be great, similar to the gpt4all readme page. (https://github.com/nomic-ai/gpt4all)

Check https://github.com/nomic-ai/gpt4all instead.

"I ran performance tests on two systems, here's the results of system 1, and heres the results of system 2. Summarize the results, and build a markdown table containing x,y,z rows."

"extract the reusable functions out of this bash script"

"write me a cfssl command to generate a intermediate CA"

"What is the regex for _____"

"Here are my accomplishments over the last 6 months, summarize them into a 1 page performance report."

etc etc etc

If you're not using GPT4 or some LLM as part of your daily flow you're working too hard.

Get GPT4All (https://gpt4all.io), log into OpenAI, drop $20 on your account, get a API key, and start using GPT4.

offline versija, nors ir ne tokia pažengus - https://github.com/nomic-ai/gpt4all ; https://gpt4all.io/index.html

Take a look at https://gpt4all.io, their docs are pretty awesome

I run one. I built an iMessage-like frontend to it using plain JS and a Python websocket backend. I mostly just use it for curiosity and playing with different prompts. I only have 16GB of RAM to dedicate to it, so I use an 8B parameter model which is enough for fun and chitchat, but I don't find it good enough to replace ChatGPT.

https://github.com/nomic-ai/gpt4all