Our great sponsors
-
-
-
WorkOS
The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS. The APIs are flexible and easy-to-use, supporting authentication, user identity, and complex enterprise features like SSO and SCIM provisioning.
-
-
txtai
💡 All-in-one open-source embeddings database for semantic search, LLM orchestration and language model workflows
-
InfluxDB
Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale. Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
Nice project!
I've spent quite a lot of time in the medical/scientific literature space. With regards to LLMs, specifically RAG, how the data is chunked is quite important. With that, I have a couple projects that might be beneficial additions.
paperetl (https://github.com/neuml/paperetl) - supports parsing arXiv, PubMed and integrates with GROBID to handle parsing metadata and text from arbitrary papers.
paperai (https://github.com/neuml/paperai) - builds embeddings databases of medical/scientific papers. Supports LLM prompting, semantic workflows and vector search. Built with txtai (https://github.com/neuml/txtai).
While arbitrary chunking/splitting can work, I've found that integrating parsing that has knowledge of medical/scientific paper structure increases the overall accuracy and experience of downstream applications.
Nice project!
I've spent quite a lot of time in the medical/scientific literature space. With regards to LLMs, specifically RAG, how the data is chunked is quite important. With that, I have a couple projects that might be beneficial additions.
paperetl (https://github.com/neuml/paperetl) - supports parsing arXiv, PubMed and integrates with GROBID to handle parsing metadata and text from arbitrary papers.
paperai (https://github.com/neuml/paperai) - builds embeddings databases of medical/scientific papers. Supports LLM prompting, semantic workflows and vector search. Built with txtai (https://github.com/neuml/txtai).
While arbitrary chunking/splitting can work, I've found that integrating parsing that has knowledge of medical/scientific paper structure increases the overall accuracy and experience of downstream applications.
Nice project!
I've spent quite a lot of time in the medical/scientific literature space. With regards to LLMs, specifically RAG, how the data is chunked is quite important. With that, I have a couple projects that might be beneficial additions.
paperetl (https://github.com/neuml/paperetl) - supports parsing arXiv, PubMed and integrates with GROBID to handle parsing metadata and text from arbitrary papers.
paperai (https://github.com/neuml/paperai) - builds embeddings databases of medical/scientific papers. Supports LLM prompting, semantic workflows and vector search. Built with txtai (https://github.com/neuml/txtai).
While arbitrary chunking/splitting can work, I've found that integrating parsing that has knowledge of medical/scientific paper structure increases the overall accuracy and experience of downstream applications.
Why does this post link to a renamed fork of Paper-QA (https://github.com/whitead/paper-qa) which has made zero changes and is 19 commits behind the original?