ntp-parser VS tail

Well nom does list out examples on the readme page, though many are probably for older versions of nom. I clicked through a couple and it looks like ntp is up to date with nom 6.0. The last full parser I wrote using nom was in v4.0 days, which was more macro-oriented than current nom. Since what you pass nom is slices of data, you will basically be reading from a file into a buffer, and calling your parsing functions on that. If it returns an error indicating it is incomplete, just read in another chunk of data into your buffer and try again.

I'm working on a side-quest, and I just started using unit tests (hurray!): https://github.com/LeCyberDucky/tail/blob/main/src/main.rs

Since the program takes over the terminal when running, my trusty old debugging method of adding print statements everywhere doesn't work all too well here. Therefore, I took on the side quest of creating my own version of the UNIX tool "tail" this weekend. I'll write my debugging statements to a file instead and then use this tool to monitor that file. There are ways to achieve this without writing my own tool, but I wasn't completely satisfied with the stuff I tried (I'm on Windows), so I thought it would be fun and hopefully be too big a detour to implement it myself.

I've been using those today in this small project: https://github.com/LeCyberDucky/tail/blob/main/src/main.rs