nsjail VS keepassxc

So what's the difference between nsjail[1] and bubblewrap[2]?

[1] https://github.com/google/nsjail

I am currently working on a code execution engine (also written in Rust) which uses nsjail for sandboxing and gnu time for measuring time and memory usage under the hood. You can run arbitrary code simply using a rest api and there is also a client library for Rust. It can already run C++, Rust and Python (and a few other languages) while allowing you to specify multiple source files, environment variables, command line arguments, standard input and resource limits (e.g. time, memory, maximum number of processes and whether network access is allowed or not). After running the program, the engine reports exit codes, outputs (stdout and stderr) and the amount of resources the program used.

KeepassXC supports exporting, but i don't think it is released in a stable version / to the public yet:

https://github.com/keepassxreboot/keepassxc/pull/8825

If you use KeePass, make sure you use the KeePassXC variant. KeePass is dead.

https://keepassxc.org/

That's why you use the superior one, KeePassXC, as linked in the NIST link: https://github.com/keepassxreboot/keepassxc/discussions/9433

Over there, they got pissed about people constantly bugging them about it and closed the bug with the last comment reading:

for the internet, use a password manager like keepassxc with a strong password.

Another regression is that KeePassX/C AutoType doesn't work with Wayland, so now instead of a simple CTRL+V in KeePassXC, I have to separately copy and paste the user and the pass.

https://github.com/keepassxreboot/keepassxc/issues/2281