nrfs
rust-fuse
nrfs | rust-fuse | |
---|---|---|
1 | 1 | |
5 | 38 | |
- | - | |
7.6 | 10.0 | |
11 months ago | over 1 year ago | |
Rust | Rust | |
MIT License | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
nrfs
-
Ask HN: Who needs beta testers? (February 2023)
https://github.com/Norost/nrfs
Project description: I'm designing a custom filesystem with compression, error correction (with mirroring) & encryption.
The aim of the project is to have a filesystem with these features while remaining considerably simpler & easier to use than ZFS, btrfs etc. In particular, I aim to make it easy to use with removable media as I got a bunch of old drives that I don't want to have powered on 24/7.
I'm looking for people willing to test the filesystem. While the filesystem appears stable I believe more issues may pop up when used for long-term storage (e.g. backups). With more people using it I hope to find these issues quicker.
There are currently only (FUSE & tool/"mkfs") binaries for Linux[1]. If you want to test it but don't have a Linux installation, please let me know and I'll see if I can create a build for your OS.
Contact info: [email protected] or on Github.
P.S.: Using a block size other than 12 is currently broken, so don't adjust that parameters when creating a filesystem.
[1] https://github.com/Norost/nrfs/releases/tag/v0.2.1-alpha0
rust-fuse
-
Nolibc: A minimal C-library replacement shipped with the kernel
The article goes into some detail about different reasons you might want a minimal userland -- test harnesses, recovery environments, and pseudo-embedded environments. I do something similar in the test framework for https://github.com/jmillikin/rust-fuse -- to perform an integration test, I boot Linux in QEMU with a tiny custom /init.
More generally, the Linux kernel has a lot of code in it that is of generally reasonable quality and has received a lot of benchmarking/testing from well-resourced users. Sure, I could run some unikernel with a third-party network stack and SCSI drivers and ext4 implementation, but Linux already has all that stuff and it's ubiquitous. Why would I care about the extra ~30 MiB of RAM or whatever that it takes?
And that's before we even get to the topic of sharing code between environments. I can run the same unmodified binary on my desktop and on a minimal kernel-only Linux, which is not generally true of most alternative kernels.
What are some alternatives?
SQLpage - SQL-only webapp builder, empowering data analysts to build websites and applications quickly
liblinux - Linux system calls.
superstartrek - The 70s Super Star Trek command line game revived as an HTML 5 app
gcsf - a FUSE file system based on Google Drive
dyrectorio - dyrector.io is a self-hosted continuous delivery & deployment platform with version management.
mountpoint-s3 - A simple, high-throughput file client for mounting an Amazon S3 bucket as a local file system.
quickadd - Parse natural language time and date expressions in python
catfs - Cache AnyThing filesystem written in Rust
notebook - Tool for Thought. ʚɞ
rust-fuse - Rust library for filesystems in userspace (FUSE)
nde - An IDE-like neovim environment, supporting many languages, which can be instantiated using a single Nix command
FlyBulkDeploy