Nox VS pyinstrument

I'm biased, but Nox is pretty well organized, documented, and commented.

I've gone through what I assume is a fairly typical journey between different ways to run tasks related to a Python project: from hand-rolled shell and Python scripts, to tox, to Nox. To be honest, I'm not sure how many people have switched from tox to Nox, but now that I've used Nox, I don't ever want to edit a tox.ini file again.

I was wondering if you have any synchronous routes in your app? We have an open issue regarding those and would love some ideas for solutions :)

Is there something about the actual profiler that differs from existing tools like pyinstrument [1] or py-spy [2]? I know pyinstrument has various output options and I wonder if it could potentially output something readable by the Firefox Profiler tool.

[1] : https://github.com/joerick/pyinstrument

I would highly recommend looking into pyinstrument to profile your requests. I find the reports to be very readable, and it's very easy to setup with Django.

I like to use pyinstrument for profiling. Uses stat sampling so it's quicker and builds a easy to grok report.

Hello! I just released pyinstrument 4.0 on PyPI. pyinstrument was my first successful open-source package and I love seeing how much use it's getting in the community.

PyInstrument, compared to cProfile or Yappi, it's a lot easier to use and requires much less configuration.

Run pytest, under pyinstrument, and generate a webpage that presents performance data, in addition to a separate junit xml report.