nlp-recipes VS opencog

Compare nlp-recipes vs opencog and see what are their differences.

Our great sponsors
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
nlp-recipes opencog
5 1
6,020 2,304
- 0.0%
0.0 3.8
over 1 year ago about 1 year ago
Python Scheme
MIT License GNU General Public License v3.0 or later
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

nlp-recipes

Posts with mentions or reviews of nlp-recipes. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-02-03.

opencog

Posts with mentions or reviews of opencog. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects.
  • Teaching a Bayesian spam to filter play chess (2005)
    1 project | news.ycombinator.com | 30 Jan 2021
    Oh man, reading what you wrote out, it just occurred to me that learning is actually caching.

    We already have a multitude of machines that can solve any problem: the global economy, corporations, capitalism (darwinian evolution casted as an economic model), organizations, our brains, etc.

    So take an existing model that works, convert it to code made up of the business logic and tests that we write every day, and start replacing the manual portions with algorithms (automate them). The "work" of learning to solve a problem is the inverse of the solution being taught. But once you know the solution, cache it and use it.

    I'm curious what the smallest fully automated model would look like. We can imagine a corporation where everyone has been replaced by a virtual agent running in code. Or a car where the driver is replaced by chips or (gasp) the cloud.

    But how about a program running on a source code repo that can incorporate new code as long as all of its current unit tests pass. At first, people around the world would write the code. But eventually, more and more of the subrepos would be cached copies of other working solutions. Basically just keep doing that until it passes the Turing test (which I realize is just passé by today's standards, look at online political debate with troll bots). We know that the compressed solution should be smaller than the 6 billion base pairs of DNA. It just doesn't seem like that hard of a problem. Except I guess it is:

    https://github.com/opencog/opencog

What are some alternatives?

When comparing nlp-recipes and opencog you can also consider the following projects:

ludwig - Low-code framework for building custom LLMs, neural networks, and other AI models

opennars - OpenNARS for Research 3.0+

OpenPrompt - An Open-Source Framework for Prompt-Learning.

gluon-nlp - NLP made easy

rasa - 💬 Open source machine learning framework to automate text- and voice-based conversations: NLU, dialogue management, connect to Slack, Facebook, and more - Create chatbots and voice assistants

ccg2lambda - Provide Semantic Parsing solutions and Natural Language Inferences for multiple languages following the idea of the syntax-semantics interface.

deepsegment - A sentence segmenter that actually works!

learn - Neuro-symbolic interpretation learning (mostly just language-learning, for now)

pymarl2 - Fine-tuned MARL algorithms on SMAC (100% win rates on most scenarios)

nli4ct

Parrot_Paraphraser - A practical and feature-rich paraphrasing framework to augment human intents in text form to build robust NLU models for conversational engines. Created by Prithiviraj Damodaran. Open to pull requests and other forms of collaboration.