opencog
gluon-nlp
Our great sponsors
opencog | gluon-nlp | |
---|---|---|
1 | 2 | |
2,304 | 2,551 | |
0.0% | - | |
3.8 | 0.0 | |
about 1 year ago | 7 months ago | |
Scheme | Python | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
opencog
-
Teaching a Bayesian spam to filter play chess (2005)
Oh man, reading what you wrote out, it just occurred to me that learning is actually caching.
We already have a multitude of machines that can solve any problem: the global economy, corporations, capitalism (darwinian evolution casted as an economic model), organizations, our brains, etc.
So take an existing model that works, convert it to code made up of the business logic and tests that we write every day, and start replacing the manual portions with algorithms (automate them). The "work" of learning to solve a problem is the inverse of the solution being taught. But once you know the solution, cache it and use it.
I'm curious what the smallest fully automated model would look like. We can imagine a corporation where everyone has been replaced by a virtual agent running in code. Or a car where the driver is replaced by chips or (gasp) the cloud.
But how about a program running on a source code repo that can incorporate new code as long as all of its current unit tests pass. At first, people around the world would write the code. But eventually, more and more of the subrepos would be cached copies of other working solutions. Basically just keep doing that until it passes the Turing test (which I realize is just passé by today's standards, look at online political debate with troll bots). We know that the compressed solution should be smaller than the 6 billion base pairs of DNA. It just doesn't seem like that hard of a problem. Except I guess it is:
https://github.com/opencog/opencog
gluon-nlp
- How usable is Julia for Natural Language Processing Machine learning?
-
Any TF 2.0 implementation of Convolutional Neural Networks for Sentence Classification ?
Found relevant code at https://github.com/dmlc/gluon-nlp + all code implementations here
What are some alternatives?
opennars - OpenNARS for Research 3.0+
Torch.jl - Sensible extensions for exposing torch in Julia.
ccg2lambda - Provide Semantic Parsing solutions and Natural Language Inferences for multiple languages following the idea of the syntax-semantics interface.
JuliaTorch - Using PyTorch in Julia Language
nlp-recipes - Natural Language Processing Best Practices & Examples
practical-pytorch - Go to https://github.com/pytorch/tutorials - this repo is deprecated and no longer maintained
learn - Neuro-symbolic interpretation learning (mostly just language-learning, for now)
nli4ct
pronomial - pronomial postag/word_gender based coreference solver
question_generation - Neural question generation using transformers
sematle - NLU service that converts plain English to known and structured data.