AppImageLauncher
| network.loki.Session | AppImageLauncher | |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 184 | |
| 2 | 5,028 | |
| - | - | |
| 5.4 | 3.7 | |
| about 1 month ago | about 1 month ago | |
| C++ | ||
| - | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
network.loki.Session
-
Can I trust Flatpak apps if they are not managed by the app developer?
The manifest is building sources rather than unpacking binaries built elsewhere. It is pretty difficult to know what sources prepackaged binaries are built from, they could in theory contain malware. Session is downloading a deb package and unpacking that, is the deb file built from the sources we see in the repo and can we know that?
AppImageLauncher
- New to fedora, any advices?
- Flatpak Is Not the Future
-
What is the proper way to install?
Every file that you want to execute has to be in your environment PATH. I would also advise to put symlinks and personal executables in ~/.local/bin and put that to your path. Since your user has ownership over that directory, you won't have any probs with permissions that may or may not occur at all. Since we're talking about AppImage files, you might also want to take a look at AppImageLauncher which does a pretty good job at creating entries for your Desktop Menu for the AppImage files that you install to your system.
-
What’s the best way to install App Man, direct or via distrobox?
I think it's safe to install it directly as it stores everything in a single directory. For AppImages there is also AppImagePool + AppImageLauncher (can be installed rootless, useful for better integration of appimages).
- Newer Linux Administrator, have a question regarding Debian builds like Ubuntu and installer.appimage files.
- AppImage won't ask anymore to Integrate after Running only once
- AppImageLauncher no longer working on Fedora 38
-
Working on an app to "install" and manage AppImages
This reminds me of a prettier version of AppImageLauncher. Is there also an "Uninstall" option in the right-click menu of the app launcher?
-
Can I trust Flatpak apps if they are not managed by the app developer?
I'm using AppImageLauncher on Fedora.
-
Standard Notes users - how are you creating shortcut to SN inDock?
"... I recall that this was related to an issue with most Electron apps, wherein the AppImage cannot be integrated with the desktop or the favourites bar. So far we've found that the AppImageLauncher (https://github.com/TheAssassin/AppImageLauncher) helps with getting around this!
What are some alternatives?
appimaged - appimaged is a daemon that monitors the system and integrates AppImages.
void-packages - The Void source packages collection
Home Manager using Nix - Manage a user environment using Nix [maintainer=@rycee]
go-appimage - Go implementation of AppImage tools
bauh - Graphical user interface for managing your Linux applications. Supports AppImage, Debian and Arch packages (including AUR), Flatpak, Snap and native Web applications
AppImageUpdate - AppImageUpdate lets you update AppImages in a decentral way using information embedded in the AppImage itself.
Signal-Desktop - A private messenger for Windows, macOS, and Linux.
undervolt - Undervolt Intel CPUs under Linux
peek - Simple animated GIF screen recorder with an easy to use interface
DesktopEditors - An office suite that combines text, spreadsheet and presentation editors allowing to create, view and edit local documents
AppImageKit - Package desktop applications as AppImages that run on common Linux-based operating systems, such as RHEL, CentOS, openSUSE, SLED, Ubuntu, Fedora, debian and derivatives. Join #AppImage on irc.libera.chat
cutter - Free and Open Source Reverse Engineering Platform powered by rizin