nala
Git
nala | Git | |
---|---|---|
11 | 287 | |
1,269 | 50,207 | |
- | 1.9% | |
7.8 | 10.0 | |
26 days ago | about 23 hours ago | |
Python | C | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 only | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
nala
-
June 30th, 2024, will bring the End of Life (EOL) of CentOS Linux
It will not automatically remove dependencies that were installed along with a package when that package is removed. I'm guessing this is due to some historical ideology about how `apt-get` was intended to function. I just typically run `apt remove foobar && apt -y autoremove`.
There is also nala, which _does_ automatically remove dependencies when you remove a package: https://github.com/volitank/nala
-
Mint vs Arch
this https://github.com/volitank/nala looks pretty cool, i'll admit.
-
Apt downloads incredibly slow
Use Nala...it sorts and downloads from fastest mirrors...
- Is there anything like nala (an apt frontend) for dnf?
- Debian user, gonna give Arch a shot. What surprises am I in for?
-
I Would Recommend "NALA" | Frontend Of APT Package Manager | Parallel Download, History, Etc.. ๐
For those interested, here is a link to nala's project page on github.
-
What is the difference between apt, apt-get and aptitude?
Nala is a front-end for libapt-pkg. Using the python-apt api.
-
What Distro are you using???
There is a wrapper for apt called nala. It looks clean and better than pacman. You might enjoy Debian family better with it.
-
Any way to make apt output more friendly like DNF?
Nala?
- Nala v0.2.0 - A Prettier Replacement for apt
Git
- Git tracks itself. See it's first commit of itself
-
Resistance against London tube map commit history (a.k.a. git merge hell) (2015)
Look at any PR/patch series that got merged into the Git project. https://github.com/git/git/
Any random one. Because those that did not meet the minimum criteria for a well-crafted history would not have passed review.
- GitHub Git Mirror Down
- Four ways to solve the "Remote Origin Already Exists" error.
-
So You Think You Know Git โ Git Tips and Tricks by Scott Chacon
Boy, I can't find this either (but also, the kernel mailing list is _really_ difficult to search). I really remember Linus saying something like "it's not a real SCM, but maybe someone could build one on top of it someday" or something like that, but I cannot figure out how to find that.
You _can_ see, though, that in his first README, he refers to what he's building as not a "real SCM":
https://github.com/git/git/commit/e83c5163316f89bfbde7d9ab23...
- Maintain-Git.txt
-
Git Commit Messages by Jeff King
Here is the direct link, as HN somehow removes the query string: https://github.com/git/git/commits?author=peff&since=2023-10...
- Git commit messages by Jeff King
- My favourite Git commit (2019)
-
Do we think of Git commits as diffs, snapshots, and/or histories?
I understand all that.
I'm saying, if you write a survey and one of the possible answers is "diff", but you don't clearly define what you mean by "diff", then don't be surprised if respondents use any reasonable definition that makes sense to them. Ask an ambiguous question, get a mishmash of answers.
The thing that Git uses for packfiles is called a "delta" by Git, but it's also reasonable to call it a "diff". After all, Git's delta algorithm is "greatly inspired by parts of LibXDiff from Davide Libenzi"[1]. Not LibXDelta but LibXDiff.
Yes, how Git stores blobs (using deltas) is orthogonal to how Git uses blobs. But while that orthogonality is useful for reasoning about Git, it's not wrong to think of a commit as the totality of what Git does, including that optimization. (Some people, when learning Git, stumble over the way it's described as storing full copies, think it's wasteful. For them to wrap their heads around Git, they have to understand that the optimization exists. Which makes sense because Git probably wouldn't be practical if it lacked that optimization.)
The reason I'm bringing all this up is, if you're trying to explain Git, which is what the original article is about, then it's very important to keep in mind that someone who is learning Git needs to know what you mean when you say "diff". Most people who already know Git would tend to gravitate toward the definition of "diff" that you're assuming (the thing that Git computes on the fly and never stores), but people who already know Git aren't the target audience when you're teaching Git.
---
[1] https://github.com/git/git/blob/master/diff-delta.c
What are some alternatives?
nitch - nitch - incredibly fast system fetch written in nim
scalar - Scalar: A set of tools and extensions for Git to allow very large monorepos to run on Git without a virtualization layer
utest.h - ๐งช single header unit testing framework for C and C++
PineappleCAS - A generic computer algebra system targeted for the TI-84+ CE calculators
dextool - Suite of C/C++ tooling built on LLVM/Clang
Subversion - Mirror of Apache Subversion
bdd-for-c - A simple BDD library for the C language
vscode-gitlens - Supercharge Git inside VS Code and unlock untapped knowledge within each repository โ Visualize code authorship at a glance via Git blame annotations and CodeLens, seamlessly navigate and explore Git repositories, gain valuable insights via rich visualizations and powerful comparison commands, and so much more
pacapt - An ArchLinux's pacman-like shell wrapper for many package managers. 56KB and run anywhere.
linux - Linux kernel source tree
nerd-fonts - Iconic font aggregator, collection, & patcher. 3,600+ icons, 50+ patched fonts: Hack, Source Code Pro, more. Glyph collections: Font Awesome, Material Design Icons, Octicons, & more
chromebrew - Package manager for Chrome OS [Moved to: https://github.com/chromebrew/chromebrew]