mykube
kata-containers
mykube | kata-containers | |
---|---|---|
4 | 11 | |
48 | 4,945 | |
- | 3.6% | |
4.8 | 10.0 | |
5 months ago | 4 days ago | |
Go | Rust | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 only | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
mykube
- A handsome k8s cluster - Is it possible?
-
Mykube - simple cli for single node K8S creatiom
Hi everyone! I invite you to look at a new repository I created called Mykube. A simple cli for creating a K8S cluster with a flannel over a virtual machine that gets created automatically. All of that with a single command. And yes, before you say anything, it's really similar to Minikube, but here is the difference: I am really open to changes and adjustments and will be glad to hear about features from you. Enjoy, and feel free to contact me.
- GitHub - guyst16/mykube: k8s-installer - One-click k8s single-node cluster installation on your own device.
- Mykube - K8S cluster easy creation
kata-containers
- Maestro: A Linux-compatible kernel in Rust
-
Fly Kubernetes
Seems like Fly.io Machines are trying reimplement Kata Containers with the Firecracker backend [0].
Kata has a guest image and guest agent to run multiple isolated containers [1].
[0] https://katacontainers.io/
[1] https://github.com/kata-containers/kata-containers/blob/main...
-
Kata Containers: Virtual Machines (VMs) that feel and perform like containers
> Last time I looked (a few months ago), the documentation was pretty sparse or outdated.
It still is, though it works somewhat seamlessly when installing with https://github.com/kata-containers/kata-containers/blob/main...
Though only one of the hypervisors works well.
-
Method to block possible internet traffic from LLaMA on MacOS
Better to use a secure VM, can even get container-like VMs with kata-containers
-
Kata Containers vs gVisor?
As I understand,Kata Containers
-
Firecracker MicroVMs
Kubernetes using Kata containers as a containerd backend
https://github.com/kata-containers/kata-containers/blob/main...
-
Container security best practices: Ultimate guide
My home k8s cluster is now "locked down" using micro-vms (kata-containers[0]), pod level firewalling (cilium[1]), permission-limited container users, and mostly immutable environments. Given how quickly I rolled this out; the tools to enhance cluster environment security seem more accessible now than my previous research a few years ago.
I know it's not exactly a production setup, but I really do feel that it's the most secure runtime environment I've ever had accessible at home. Probably more so than my desktops, which you could argue undermines most of my effort, but I like to think I'm pretty careful.
In the beginning I was very skeptical, but being able to just build a docker/OCI image and then manage its relationships with other services with "one pane of glass" that I can commit to git is so much simpler to me than my previous workflows. My previous setup involved messing with a bunch of tools like packer, cloud-init, terraform, ansible, libvirt, whatever firewall frontend was on the OS, and occasionally sshing in for anything not covered.
[0] https://github.com/kata-containers/kata-containers
-
Docker Without Docker
I'm really impressed by fly.io, and the candidness with which they share some of their really awesome technology. Being container-first is the next step for PaaS IMO and they are ahead of the pack.
I aim to build a platform like theirs someday (probably not any time soon) but I don't think I'd do any of what they're doing -- it feels unnecessary. Bear with me as I recently learned that they use nomad[0] and some of these suggestions are kubernetes projects but I'd love to hear why the following technologies were decided against (if they were):
- kata-containers[1] (it does the whole container -> VM flow for you, automatically, nemu, firecracker) with multiple VMM options[2]
- linuxkit[3] (let's say you didn't go with kata-containers, this is another container->VM path)
- firecracker-containerd[4] (very minimal keep-your-container-but-run-it-as-a-VM)
- kubevirt[5] (if you just want to actually run VMs, regardless of how you built them)
- Ceph[6] for storage -- make LVM pools and just give them to Ceph, you'll get blocks, distributed filesystems (CephFS), and object gateways (S3/Swift) out of it (in the k8s space Rook manages this)
As an aside to all this, there's also LXD, which supports running "system" (user namespace isolated) containers, VMs (somewhat recent[7][8]), live migration via criu[9], management/migration of underlying filesystems, runs on LVM or zfs[10], it's basically all-in-one, but does fall behind in terms of ecosystem since everyone else is aboard the "cloud native"/"works-with-kubernetes" train.
I've basically how I plan to run a service like fly.io if I ever did -- so maybe my secret is out, but I sure would like to know just how much of this fly.io got built on (if any of it), and/or what was turned down.
[0]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26745514
[1]: https://github.com/kata-containers/kata-containers
[2]: https://github.com/kata-containers/kata-containers/blob/2fc7...
[3]: https://github.com/linuxkit/linuxkit
[4]: https://github.com/firecracker-microvm/firecracker-container...
[5]: https://github.com/kubevirt/kubevirt
[6]: https://docs.ceph.com/
[7]: https://discuss.linuxcontainers.org/t/running-virtual-machin...
[8]: https://github.com/lxc/lxd/issues/6205
[9]: https://criu.org/Main_Page
[10]: https://linuxcontainers.org/lxd/docs/master/storage
-
Checking Your --privileged Container
Kata Containers https://github.com/kata-containers/kata-containers
What are some alternatives?
kind - Kubernetes IN Docker - local clusters for testing Kubernetes
firecracker-containerd - firecracker-containerd enables containerd to manage containers as Firecracker microVMs
Eru - Eru, a simple, stateless, flexible, production-ready orchestrator designed to easily integrate into existing workflows. Can run any virtualization things in long or short time.
kubevirt - Kubernetes Virtualization API and runtime in order to define and manage virtual machines.
runtime - Kata Containers version 1.x runtime (for version 2.x see https://github.com/kata-containers/kata-containers).
lxd - Powerful system container and virtual machine manager [Moved to: https://github.com/canonical/lxd]
vmify - VMify - From Docker Image to the Cloud in Seconds
sysbox - An open-source, next-generation "runc" that empowers rootless containers to run workloads such as Systemd, Docker, Kubernetes, just like VMs.
launchpad - From Code to Kubernetes in One Step.
gvisor - Application Kernel for Containers
ignite - Ignite a Firecracker microVM
cloud-hypervisor - A Virtual Machine Monitor for modern Cloud workloads. Features include CPU, memory and device hotplug, support for running Windows and Linux guests, device offload with vhost-user and a minimal compact footprint. Written in Rust with a strong focus on security.