muzero-general VS engine262

I went looking for MuZero implementations in order to see how, exactly, they interact with the game space. Based on this one, which had the most stars in the muzero topic, it appears that it needs to be able to discern legal next steps from the current game state https://github.com/werner-duvaud/muzero-general/blob/master/...

So, I guess for the cards Forge has implemented one could MuZero it, but I believe it's a bit chicken and egg with a "free text" game like M:TG -- in order to train one would need to know legal steps for any random game state, but in order to have legal steps one would need to be able to read and interpret English rules and card text

You may want to use the trick described in https://arxiv.org/pdf/1805.11593.pdf as a Transformed Bellman Operator. Its efficiency is proved in MuZero original paper https://arxiv.org/pdf/1911.08265.pdf Appendix F. The implementation of that method you can find here: https://github.com/werner-duvaud/muzero-general Usage: muzero/models.py:649 (def support_to_scalar)

I have used this implementation from MuZero: https://github.com/werner-duvaud/muzero-general

+1 to taking a look at OpenSpiel. It has AlphaZero in C++ and Python, and there is even a PR open that allows running UCI (e.g. Stockfish) bot. You can also load chess via the OpenSpiel wrapper in muzero-general: https://github.com/werner-duvaud/muzero-general

When I looked up some community implementations, like that of Werner Duvaud on GitHub and Discord, hoping to make my own contributions to this effect, I soon found that I was hopelessly out of my depth as an amateur programmer, even with the help of some other sources like this walkthrough series. However, from what I could tell, most of the people working on this sort of thing seemed to be tackling relatively simple games. At first I thought this might be largely due to limitations in hobby time or computing power available to these users, but then I also noticed that, unless I have misunderstood something, it seems like the games are required to be rebuilt entirely in the engine of (this implementation of) MuZero, which would also obviously be a limit on the complexity of games chosen.

Windows support (Experimental / Workaround: Use the notebook in Google Colab)

There are several if you google "muzero github", e.g. https://github.com/werner-duvaud/muzero-general

engine262

Indeed. ECMA-262 has been implemented using JavaScript https://github.com/engine262/engine262.

Node.js is not the only JavaScript runtime. JavaScript runtimes have been written using JavaScript alone, see engine262. There is also Deno, QuickJS, txiki.js, Bun, none of which use COmmonJS by default, SpiderMonkey, et al.

for an interpreted language like JS, this project is really nice https://github.com/engine262/engine262. More or less 2 parts: parser and evaluator

That is a bit complex, so here's a list of JS engines: if you pick one written *in* JS, that would probably be most useful -- engine262 for example

then you might be impressed by https://github.com/engine262/engine262 as well

Engine 262

It's outside of what you asked for, but here's a JavaScript engine in JavaScript. Might make for some interesting bedtime reading!

Interesting to see a JS implementation written in JS:

https://github.com/engine262/engine262/

(The readme explains what the point of it is.)