mmb VS blankly

there is this: https://github.com/purefinance/mmb

I wanted to add a couple of words about our open source trading infrastructure mentioned in the article: https://github.com/purefinance/mmb. This is something we've been working for about 2 years but we haven't shared it publicly until now (besides github of course). I might be wrong but I believe it's the only well maintained trading infrastructure in Rust and we're gradually increasing the amount of resources dedicated to it. So if you're interested in this field, feel confident to build on top of it as there's a significant backing behind it, so it will be maintained long-term. Having said it, this project haven't been used a lot outside of our internal teams, so there could be some surprises. If anything goes wrong, please feel free to contacts us on github or anywhere else.

Looks interesting.

I recently came across this newer platform Blankly with similar goals, it has great docs and easy to get started

https://github.com/Blankly-Finance/Blankly

Have a look at line 25 & 26 of Alpaca_api.py. The URLs don't match the "sandbox" URLs that Alpaca gives it's users.

Hey we developed and open sourced a python package called Blankly. It allows you to merge the live environment with the development environment by allowing models to be backtestable, paper tradable, and then immediately run live without changing any code (except strategy.backtest() becomes strategy.start()). It's all free and open source of course so I like using it more than online platforms and theres no sketchy IP claims.