middleclass VS moonscript

I am trying to document my code and I am using LDoc for that and for OOP I am using the library middleclass. All of my classes are in a main framework folder and inside that I have each namespace as a folder and then classes that are specific to that namespace in those folders.

The ConTeXt typesetting system tightly integrates Lua. One aspect of Lua that I dislike is its inability to easily write OOP-ish code. What's impressive about the language is that it can be extended to do so in astonishingly little code:

* https://github.com/kikito/middleclass

With OOP in place, I was able to typeset a hexagonal grid and a symbolic representation of a neural network on top, using a more OOP-like approach. The classes are straightforward.

A vertex defines a point in 2D space:

* https://github.com/DaveJarvis/keenwrite-themes/blob/main/bos...

An edge connects two vertices:

* https://github.com/DaveJarvis/keenwrite-themes/blob/main/bos...

A graph connects edges:

* https://github.com/DaveJarvis/keenwrite-themes/blob/main/bos...

A priority queue serves for ordering graph edges by weight of adjoining vertices:

* https://github.com/DaveJarvis/keenwrite-themes/blob/main/bos...

With these concepts in hand, we can typeset a grid and a "neural network" on top:

* https://github.com/DaveJarvis/keenwrite-themes/blob/main/bos...

Here's an example of the output for chapter 1:

* https://i.ibb.co/19DCDZy/ch-1.png

And chapter 14, where the "network" has grown in complexity:

* https://i.ibb.co/ncf16vg/ch-2.png

This is for my near future hard sci-fi book on AGI. I'm looking for alpha readers to give me feedback. See profile for contact details.

To reduce the amount of boilerplate code, I created the fork of middleclass repo suitable for Neovim plugin managers: it just adds a symlink to middleclass.lua file in lua/ directory. middleclass is well known and tested, so I suggest using it as a standard class realization. I also open a pull request to merge it upstream.

Not exactly what op asked, but if you want classes in Lua definitely check out https://github.com/kikito/middleclass

Like /u/TheMightyHUG pointed out below, there are patterns you can use to do OOP without any extra help. In the past I have used some libraries to improve the ease of doing so, specifically middleclass: https://github.com/kikito/middleclass

Same, but when I do I like when authors include everything in one file so it's easy to manage. Here we have the library, some small 10 line file with helper functions that's required and we also need to remember about the licence. Take middleclass as an example, one file, license included, ready to plug and develop.

Now I like lua, and think single pass is the way to go for interpreted, since you don't have the disadvantage of a slow compile time no matter how big your codebase gets, BUT its not great to write in. things like +=, ++, are not possible, which means the only solution is to transpile into it, which has led to some good languages like moonscript[0], teal[1] which offers static type checking, an absolute must as your codebase grows.

[0]: https://moonscript.org/

That can be very productive and clever, but be - and stay - aware that such polyglot solutions tend to be maintenance headaches in the longer run.

There is a really nice open source project out there that allows you to train your hearing and your sightreading, but it's written in the authors own language which in turn compiles to JavaScript and the headache to set up their toolchain is such that I haven't bothered fixing any of the bugs that I'm aware of (and there are plenty).

https://sightreading.training/

https://github.com/leafo/sightreading.training

It's written in a language called 'Moonscript':

https://github.com/leafo/moonscript

Which compiles to Lua. Which compiles to JS.

Madness. Nice madness, but still, it stopped me from being a contributor.

RE: the cost of switching at this point, what about languages that compile to Lua? Like https://moonscript.org/. That would let you keep the legacy code, no?

In the case of Lapis, it is actually written in Moonscript, which needs a few more things.

There's also some languages made to compile straight to Lua: - MoonScript is the most popular Lua wrapper - it's built to be more Python-like, featuring indentation-based scopes, function calls without parentheses, lambda syntax, list comprehension, and much more. - Yuescript is a modern update to MoonScript that adds more features (I haven't used it myself, so I'm not entirely sure exactly how it differs from MS). - Teal is a version of Lua that adds static typing for better code standards.

A programmer-friendly language that compiles to Lua.

This is a sample code for learning, written in Moonscript for TIC-80: