manticoresearch
beir
manticoresearch | beir | |
---|---|---|
33 | 8 | |
8,350 | 1,388 | |
1.6% | 4.0% | |
9.9 | 4.2 | |
about 18 hours ago | about 2 months ago | |
C++ | Python | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 only | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
manticoresearch
-
Building and testing Manticore Search
Note, you need to do it in the root folder of a clone from https://github.com/manticoresoftware/manticoresearch
-
OpenObserve: Open source Elasticsearch alternative in Rust for logs. 140x lower storage cost
Interesting, how does it compare to Mantico search?
-
Creating an Abstraction around Search Engines (First Release)
Where Manticore Search? https://manticoresearch.com/
-
Using ChatGPT Plugins with LLaMA
It's not open source since 2017. The open source fork is https://github.com/manticoresoftware/manticoresearch
-
I am having trouble finding open source projects that fit my skillset
I haven't looked at the code, but I've seen https://github.com/manticoresoftware/manticoresearch popping up in a few places. Might be worth looking at. It would be great to have a faster drop-in replacement for Elasticsearch that's not written in Java. They blogged about it here: https://manticoresearch.com/blog/manticore-alternative-to-elasticsearch/
- What is the easiest way to make searchable, sortable, multi-criteria database frontpage?
- Making a Homegrown ClickHouse Log for $20/mo
-
Manticore 6.0.0 – a faster alternative to Elasticsearch in C++
I don't see anywhere where they claim that it's faster simply because it's written in C++. They do mention that they make use of C++ to add low level optimizations that make queries faster and the memory imprint smaller, but any claims about performance in the readme are linked to benchmarks to back up their claims
https://github.com/manticoresoftware/manticoresearch/
https://db-benchmarks.com/test-taxi/#manticore-search-vs-ela...
-
Manticore Search 6
contributors
- I created Atomic: Self Hosted Open Source Alternative to Reclaim, Clockwise & Motion
beir
-
On building a semantic search engine
The BEIR project might be what you're looking for: https://github.com/beir-cellar/beir/wiki/Leaderboard
- BEIR: A Heterogeneous Benchmark for Information Retrieval
-
Benefits of hybrid search
Custom datasets can also be evaluated using this method as specified in this link. This article and the associated benchmarks script can be reused to evaluate what method works best on your data.
-
Meilisearch vs. Elasticsearch
> Meilisearch focuses on simplicity, relevancy, and performance.
> excellent relevance out of the box
> if ease of use, performance, and relevancy are important to you, Meilisearch was made for you
Is there a benchmark that shows Meilisearch outperforming Elasticsearch in terms of relevance score? I couldn't find Meilisearch listed on https://github.com/beir-cellar/beir.
- Manticore 6.0.0 – a faster alternative to Elasticsearch in C++
-
An alternative to Elasticsearch that runs on a few MBs of RAM
There are actually benchmarks that allow measuring search relevancy objectively, e.g. BEIR[1]. Manticore Search team did an effort to make a PR to include it to the list. The results are here [2]. Unfortunately the BEIR team seems to be too busy to review a whole pile of PRs including about Vespa. Nevertheless it would be nice to have both Meilisearch and Typesense there too since it's interesting what performance those non-tf-idf based search engines would show compared to BM25-based and vector search engines.
[1] https://github.com/beir-cellar/beir
-
Manticore Search: Elasticsearch Alternative
True! Here's a pull request to BEIR to compare Manticore with Elasticsearch in terms of relevance https://github.com/beir-cellar/beir/pull/92. Spoiler: in this test Manticore provides better relevance than Elasticsearch in average. Of course you can tune both further and Elasticsearch now has KNN which when combined with BM25 can give even better relevance. In general I would say for most users the results quality in terms of full-text relevance is about the same in Elasticseach and Manticore.
-
Manticore: a faster alternative to Elasticsearch in C++ with a 21-year history
But there's for example BEIR that compared BM25 vs state of the art ML language models and it turned out BM25 is in average better than all of them unless you rerank top 100 results from Elasticsearch using the language models. With Manticore you can get even better relevance than with Elasticsearch. We made a pull-request to BEIR to demonstrate that https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1_ZyYkPJ_K0st9FJBrjbZqX14nmCCPVlE_y3a_y5KkYI/edit#gid=0
What are some alternatives?
Elasticsearch - Free and Open, Distributed, RESTful Search Engine
columnar - Manticore Columnar Library
Typesense - Open Source alternative to Algolia + Pinecone and an Easier-to-Use alternative to ElasticSearch ⚡ 🔍 ✨ Fast, typo tolerant, in-memory fuzzy Search Engine for building delightful search experiences
hub
MeiliSearch - A lightning-fast search API that fits effortlessly into your apps, websites, and workflow
ui - https://db-benchmarks.com website
quickwit - Cloud-native search engine for observability. An open-source alternative to Datadog, Elasticsearch, Loki, and Tempo.
sonic - 🦔 Fast, lightweight & schema-less search backend. An alternative to Elasticsearch that runs on a few MBs of RAM.
tape - Tasks Assessing Protein Embeddings (TAPE), a set of five biologically relevant semi-supervised learning tasks spread across different domains of protein biology.
manticoresearch-php - Official PHP client for Manticore Search
db-benchmarks - Fair database benchmarks framework and datasets