magma-nvim VS nvim-ipy

You use magma-nvim for interactive jupyter experience (or my fork which also includes three last PRs)

FYSA: https://github.com/dccsillag/magma-nvim & https://gitlab.com/usmcamp0811/nvim-julia-autotest

Check out Magma.. it works with Julia.. see my open PR for examples... does require IJulia.

Just throwing this out there... cause its pretty cool!! https://github.com/dccsillag/magma-nvim

I use them all the time and there are many features that differentiates it from vim, which is why I asked for clarification. In any case this plugin is pretty sweet if you want to evaluate cells within vim: https://github.com/dccsillag/magma-nvim

Have you taken a look at https://github.com/dccsillag/magma-nvim?

My current workflow is a combined version of Maxwellrules' solution and magma.nvim. I am mostly satisfied. I could maybe use vim-jukit's cell division, but otherwise I am good for now. Though again: I am definitely open for better solutions.

You can check out https://github.com/dccsillag/magma-nvim A nice, integrated solution in my opinion.

In my setup the figures appear as new windows on my other monitor, which works really well. If you want to display the figures inline, you can for example use QtConsole. You would then need another plugin to connect vim and IPython, for example vim-ipython (no support for cells as far as I know) or nvim-ipy (for neovim). Here's an article that describes a setup with the latter: https://www.blog.gambitaccepted.com/2020/04/26/neovim-qtconsole-setup/

There's also nvim-ipy (but I don't use neovim, so I can't recommend it).