magic VS docco

Magic Animations: this library provides a set of pre-built animations that can be easily applied to elements on a page. The library includes animations that can be used to animate CSS Grid layouts, such as fades, slides, flips, and more.

Documentation | Github

2. Magic Effects

Minimamente https://www.minimamente.com/project/magic/

7. Minimamente CSS

3.Magic Animations- these effects genuinely feel like magic because they push CSS to its limit.

An advantage of this approach is that it lets us utilize any CSS animation library that works off of the same concept of adding and removing classes. Some of the more popular libraries that work this way are animate.css and magic.css. Chris Coyier has an amazing article on CSS Tricks that lists more of these if you are interested.

6. Magic

Magic Animation

i have seen those in annotated javascript documentation. but it was the other way around. (comment on the left, and code on the right).

they all seem to use docco[0] with the option to display comment in "parallel". the author of docco used it in their library underscore[1].

[0]: https://github.com/jashkenas/docco

Side note - it's been a while since i've seen a Docco-style annotated-source-style documentation! http://ashkenas.com/docco/

Backbone.js was the first time i saw it, and I loved it! https://backbonejs.org/docs/backbone.html It demonstrated to me that the libraries I use are just normal code that other people write, and i myself can read it to understand a problem.

jashkenas/docco - Literate Programming can be Quick and Dirty.