lwlog VS bauh

I would be very glad and honored if you drop a critique, an opinion, an idea, or want to contribute to the project:https://github.com/ChristianPanov/lwlog

I am working on a c++ logging library, which you can check out here: https://github.com/ChristianPanov/lwlog

I would be very glad and honored if you drop a critique, an opinion, an idea, or want to contribute to the project:https://github.com/ChristianPanov/lwlog

• UTF support

I have done benchmarks against spdlog, and you can take a look at them in the README in the repository

Also benchmarking is not done correctly in the main repository. I have benchmarks in my private dev repository and I am benchmarking either with picobench or nanobench. So if you want to benchmark, do NOT rely on the Benchmark.h file in the project (it's a temporary file that is meant to be removed)

I would be very glad and honored if you drop a critique, an opinion, an idea, or want to contribute to the project: https://github.com/ChristianPanov/lwlog

Like bauh which supports AppImage, Arch packages (including AUR), Debian packages, Flatpak, Snap and native Web applications

github/vinifmor/bauh

If you really want a GUI package manager that doesn't break EndeavourOS, I've had a good experience with bauh when I started using EOS. But I also do everything with yay now, as others have suggested, it is more convenient once you know the commands.

Lastly, deb-get + pacstall + bauh. All of these combined covers 99% of my software needs, much less need to find and install PPAs and .deb manually. Still not as convenient as AUR, but much better than it was before. Hopefully, eventually everything is on Flatpak, snap, or AppImage so I could just use Bauh for most apps, but for now, I'm glad that these tools exists.

Is it an AppImage? Did you make it executable? If you use a lot of AppImages then you may want to add DE integration via their utility. I do not use it, as it runs a backgroudn daemon, I prefer using bauh instead.

Bauh https://github.com/vinifmor/bauh

You can use bauh. Supports AppImage, Arch packages (including AUR), Debian packages, Flatpak, Snap and native Web applications. GitHub

You may wanna take a look at bauh.

Although, if I had to I would personally suggest bauh if you want a graphical package manager. I haven't had any issues with using it, and neither have I seen people complaining about it. It also supports the following formats: AUR packages, AppImages, Flatpak, Snap and Web applications. It also integrates with Timeshift to provide a simple and safe backup process before applying changes to your system.