lwc
flyctl
lwc | flyctl | |
---|---|---|
19 | 545 | |
1,563 | 1,314 | |
0.3% | 1.4% | |
9.5 | 9.9 | |
6 days ago | 2 days ago | |
JavaScript | Go | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
lwc
-
lwc.dev
Actually I was wondering if lwc oss is still a thing. The website lwc.dev looks like it hasn't been updated since the release in 2019. Are many people using it or was it a nice try by Salesforce but can we consider it dead? I know of course it can't compete with react, vue or angular, but has it built a nice user base around it to keep it interesting?
-
The benefits of Web Component Libraries
Web component browser APIs aren't that many, and not that hard to grasp (if you don't know about them, have a look at Google's Learn HTML section and MDN's Web Components guide); but creating a web component actually requires taking care of many small things. This is where web component libraries come in very handy, freeing us of having to think about some of those things by taking care of them for us. Most of the things I'll mention here are handled one way of another by other libraries (GitHub's Catalyst, Haunted, Hybrids, Salesforce's LWC, Slim.JS, Ionic's Stencil) but I'll focus on Google's Lit and Microsoft's FAST here as they probably are the most used web component libraries out there (ok, I lied, Lit definitely is, FAST not that much, far behind Lit and Stencil; but Lit and FAST have many things in common, starting with the fact that they are just native web components, contrary to Stencil that compiles to a web component). Both Lit and FAST leverage TypeScript decorators to simplify the code even further so I'll use that in examples, even though they can also be used in pure JS (decorators are coming to JS soon BTW). I'll also leave the most apparent yet most complex aspect for the end.
-
The Journey to Becoming a Rockstar Salesforce Developer
Now in Alba’s role, she and her team use Lightning Web Components (LWC) to create custom user interfaces, a framework based on Web Components standards. With LWC, Alba creates components using modern, standard JavaScript. This means the skills that she learned previously are transferable to other JavaScript-based technologies. She pointed out that on top of this transferability, LWC is open source, and developers can use it outside of the Salesforce platform. Components can be used in Lightning App Builder and published on the AppExchange for other customers to use them.
- I'm not convinced that "modern" web dev is also "better"
-
Light DOM and Lightning Web Components in Salesforce
Lightning Web Components (LWC) from Salesforce are based on standard Web Components built using HTML and JavaScript. They are lightweight, easy to build, and perform well in modern browsers. When building LWCs, you’ll become familiar with the concept of composition: piecing together simple building-block components within the body of a more complex component.
-
heroku free plans will be removed :(
Indeed. Ever built anything in LWR+LWC opensource? It's opensource where you don't get to open its source. Most of the documentation is a mess between outdated Aura components and their new lwc.dev site which has like 2% of the material you actually need.
- I learned how to use hooks in react tonight!!!
-
Switching from VisualForce to Lightning Web Components
If you want to use LWC outside of Salesforce to build a website, check out LWC OSS
-
lwc VS minze - a user suggested alternative
2 projects | 5 Feb 2022
-
Static Analysis with ESLint and LWC
Salesforce developed Lightning Web Components (LWC) as a fast, enterprise-grade wrapper around vanilla web components. LWC is built on the same HTML, CSS, and JavaScript that powers the web, so any analyzer for those languages can be applied here.
flyctl
-
How to deploy a nestjs back-end from a mono repo on fly.io
To begin visit fly.io to create an account. Next install flyctl a command line tool for creating and deploying fly apps. macOS
-
Getting started with Open SaaS
For frontend deployment, I used Netlify (for the generous free package) and the recommended fly.io for server + database (also cheap package).
-
Breaking the Myth: Scalable, Multi-Region, Low-Latency App Exists And Will Not Cost You A Kidney.
Create an account on Fly.io.
-
How to use fly.io and Tigris to deploy a Next.js app
You can learn more about fly.io and tigris, we will need to create an account on both platforms for this project regardless. Anyway with the theory out of the way let's get started in the next section as we create our accounts and start building the app.
-
Set up your own personal browser in the Cloud
Fly.io is a platform that helps you run your apps and databases closer to your users all around the world. It takes your app code, packages it up neatly, and puts it on virtual machines that can be quickly started or stopped. This makes your app faster for users and more reliable. Fly.io is easy to use, works well for small projects or personal apps. It's a great way to make sure your app runs smoothly for people no matter where they are.
-
NoSQL Postgres: Add MongoDB compatibility to your Supabase projects with FerretDB
In this post, we'll start from scratch, running FerretDB locally via Docker, trying out the connection with mongosh and the MongoDB Node.js client, and finally deploy FerretDB to Fly.io for a production ready set up.
-
Free tools for developers to build their apps
2- fly.io
-
Top 5 Ways To Host Your Full-Stack App For Free 🚀✨
Fly is a cloud platform that focuses on global edge computing. Fly specializes in high-performance hosting and provides a global network of edge locations. Fly is known for its scalability and performance optimizations.
-
Tech stack used for SaaS
But videototextai.com is built using NextJS + Firebase auth + Firestore and a backend deployed at fly.io . Fly makes it really easy to deploy docker containers and that is IMO the fastest way to develop, you can setup a local setup
-
Is it still worth choosing Heroku in 2023?
Alternatives explored: * northflank: While running the wrk test, requests were taking 3-7 seconds. Couldn't repeat Heroku's phenomenon of "400ms-800ms" during such a load test. * fly.io: Reliability: It’s Not Great * render.com: I remember the time when indiehackers.com was down because of an outage on Render, not sure if it's worth trusting.
What are some alternatives?
image-crop-element - A custom element for cropping a square image. Returns x, y, width, and height.
vercel - Develop. Preview. Ship.
lwc-typescript-boilerplate - Example of typescript in LWC
supabase - The open source Firebase alternative.
material-web - Material Design Web Components
s6-overlay - s6 overlay for containers (includes execline, s6-linux-utils & a custom init)
spectrum-web-components - Spectrum Web Components
podman-compose - a script to run docker-compose.yml using podman
office-ui-fabric-react - Fluent UI web represents a collection of utilities, React components, and web components for building web applications.
litestream - Streaming replication for SQLite.
animated-web-components - Basic periodic animations using a single tag with Web Components
Dokku - A docker-powered PaaS that helps you build and manage the lifecycle of applications