ludwig VS xonsh

This is a great project, little bit similar to https://github.com/ludwig-ai/ludwig, but it includes testing capabilities and ablation.

questions regarding the LLM testing aspect: How extensive is the test coverage for LLM use cases, and what is the current state of this project area? Do you offer any guarantees, or is it considered an open-ended problem?

Would love to see more progress toward this area!

Two random examples I found from 30 seconds of googling: Here’s Netflix using it in their crisis management tool, and here’s Uber using it in their deep learning framework.

They list themselves all over the internet as an "open source contributor" to Uber, which as far I can tell is based entirely on... reporting that there was an issue with a favicon. To me, it seems like they'll be cheating anybody who employs them based on this, ahem, "experience". And that feels like the tip of the iceberg.

xonsh – Python-powered, cross-platform, Unix-gazing shell

You need to downgrade ptk version. Look here - https://github.com/xonsh/xonsh/issues/5241#issuecomment-1961...

Friends, I'm not saying that tools like zx are not good. I do like to write some scripts using js/ts. I believe pythoners prefer https://xon.sh/ . Perl is also attractive and interesting. Fish is friendly.

However, I still believe that posix-shell has its own advantages. The balance among size, code length, and expressiveness. I think the only possible competitors are tcl and perl, maybe lua.

Those of you who use (or used) this as your shell: care to share your experience?

It seems a lot less full-featured than https://xon.sh/, but maybe you don't need a lot of bells and whistles for regular usage. I mostly run build, execute, and install commands.

I'm somewhat enticed at the possibility of being able to wrap common executables into forms that are typed (like nushell or elvish) and manipulate them in a way that leverages the type checker.

In that case, is it even more similar to xonsh?

https://xon.sh/