ludwig VS starlite

This is a great project, little bit similar to https://github.com/ludwig-ai/ludwig, but it includes testing capabilities and ablation.

questions regarding the LLM testing aspect: How extensive is the test coverage for LLM use cases, and what is the current state of this project area? Do you offer any guarantees, or is it considered an open-ended problem?

Would love to see more progress toward this area!

Two random examples I found from 30 seconds of googling: Here’s Netflix using it in their crisis management tool, and here’s Uber using it in their deep learning framework.

They list themselves all over the internet as an "open source contributor" to Uber, which as far I can tell is based entirely on... reporting that there was an issue with a favicon. To me, it seems like they'll be cheating anybody who employs them based on this, ahem, "experience". And that feels like the tip of the iceberg.

For the past one and a half years 😁. Checkout our docs https://starliteproject.dev/

#1286 is the issue tracking the removal of our last internal Pydantic datastructure, and PR #1382 has the addition of attrs based signature modelling. Once those are merged you will be able to use Starlite without Pydantic.

You can go to Open an Issue and open an issue for a feature request/enhancement and describe basically the behavior you are wanting to see.

Falcon FastAPI Sanic Starlite (disclosure: I do work here)

for server side , starliteproject.dev/, only python async framwork worth looking into.

Well, I'm not objective but I'd say Starlite (https://github.com/starlite-api/starlite) is a might fine codebase. You can also learn a lot about tooling and typing going through it.

I have mentioned your concerns to the Starlite discussions board - https://github.com/starlite-api/starlite/discussions/1183

You can find the complete changelog on our v1.51.0 GitHub release page.