zk VS org-brain

Hey there, here's some packages that might help you: - Org Roam - Denote - Zk

The citar package, which I created, has note integration packages available for both org-roam and denote (along with zk).

You could try denote as some others suggest. I found this, which takes inspiration from zettelkasten like roam but uses plain text and no database, https://github.com/localauthor/zk

You might try zk. I think it checks most of those boxes. https://github.com/localauthor/zk

Thanks for the links. A lot of ideas are very relatable and I agree, that the Zettelkasten might not fit the general note taking needs. As I pointed out, I am specifically interested in utilizing the zettelkasten-method in a research-workflow aiming to assist (and track) a structured cognition process. However, tools like org-roam and delve (which I recently checked out) introduce a certain degree of complexity to the system -- especially if you want to understand the technicalities of the utilized solution. Therefore, I'm very much intrigued by zk, developed by /u/oldjawbone recently. Asking you as the die hard PIM-enthusiast who you certainly are: What is your opinion on zk's general design decisions? Do you think it is reasonably future-proof,/u/publicvoit?

Located here: https://github.com/localauthor/zk

What about org-brain. I've used it a couple of years ago, could be of interest.

the main plugins would be the built-in org-mode and additionally either one of org-roam or org-brain (I use org-roam with org-roam-ui)

I use org-brain. It doesn't use a db, only org ids. It supports both file and headline entries but you can disable the file ones by setting org-brain-include-file-entries to nil

Looks nice! Btw have you seen org-brain? It is org-only but also seems minimal in dependencies.

org-brain

Just remembered: Org-brain. That style of UI seems like it might work