zk VS zettelkasten-mode

Hey there, here's some packages that might help you: - Org Roam - Denote - Zk

The citar package, which I created, has note integration packages available for both org-roam and denote (along with zk).

You could try denote as some others suggest. I found this, which takes inspiration from zettelkasten like roam but uses plain text and no database, https://github.com/localauthor/zk

You might try zk. I think it checks most of those boxes. https://github.com/localauthor/zk

Thanks for the links. A lot of ideas are very relatable and I agree, that the Zettelkasten might not fit the general note taking needs. As I pointed out, I am specifically interested in utilizing the zettelkasten-method in a research-workflow aiming to assist (and track) a structured cognition process. However, tools like org-roam and delve (which I recently checked out) introduce a certain degree of complexity to the system -- especially if you want to understand the technicalities of the utilized solution. Therefore, I'm very much intrigued by zk, developed by /u/oldjawbone recently. Asking you as the die hard PIM-enthusiast who you certainly are: What is your opinion on zk's general design decisions? Do you think it is reasonably future-proof,/u/publicvoit?

Located here: https://github.com/localauthor/zk

I tried to do this on top of deft, but unfortunately deft is designed as a user-focused package and can't be reasonably used as a library. I tried, mind you (warning: this package is very broken and hacky), but even if I had gotten that to work I think I would end up wanting a richer index and pre-processing of input data (when entered into the zettelkasten index, I should be able to parse out all forward-links for example, and store them separately so they're searchable without a regex over full-text).